Dynamically changing market conditions require increasing workflow efficiency at a mining enterprise, which enhances its stability in the commodity market. Restricted resources at the enterprise lead to a situation when production volumes become most prioritized, often to the detriment of production safety. At the same time, production safety is the basis on which enterprise stability is built. The enterprise safety must be controlled via the reduction of risk of negative events. Increasing control efficiency is based on the desire of employees to implement the control, which, in turn, is ensured by employee’s motivation for such activities.
Based on Maslow’s human needs pyramid, it is possible to determine the needs of personnel; meeting these needs will motivate employees for occupational safety activities. According to the pyramid, physiological human needs are basic. In conditions of production, these needs are met by establishing optimal or acceptable working conditions characterized by the class of working conditions. The need for safety is classified as a higher-level need; in conditions of production, it is ensured by establishing safe working conditions. The safety level can be evaluated using the safety index. Social needs are on the third level of the hierarchy. Evaluation of the level of motivating factors enables a potential satisfaction of employee’s needs, assessment of his/her motivation for the implementation of occupational safety measures, and forecasting the level of safety to be ensured.
2. Шубинцева Е.Б. Разработка модели мотивации и ее практическое применение в горнорудном производстве// Вестник Магнитогорского государственного технического университета им. Г.И. Носова. 2012. № 3 (39). С. 76–78.
3. Вовлечение персонала в совершенствование организации труда на Сибайском подземном руднике/ З.Р. Гибадуллин, Ф.Х. Макшуков, Ф.И. Акшенцев, А.Е. Трильев// Вестник Магнитогорского государственного технического университета им. Г.И. Носова. 2012. № 3 (39). С. 70–72.
4. Relationship Between Occupational Safety and Health Policy Principles, Organizational Action on Work-related Stress and the Psychosocial Work Environment in Italy/ S. Leka, L. Torres, A. Jain et al.// Safety and Health at Work. 2023. Vol. 14. Iss. 4. P. 425–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.10.001
5. Fostering a safety culture in manufacturing through safety behavior: A structural equation modelling approach/ N.A. Amirah, N.F. Nik Him, A. Rashid et al.// Journal of Safety and Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 1. Iss. 2. P. 108–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsasus.2024.03.001
6. Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 2010. 744 с.
7. Большая психологическая энциклопедия/ А.Б. Альмуханова, Е.С. Гладкова, Е.В. Есина и др. М.: ЭКСМО, 2007. 543 с.
8. Мерлин В.С. Лекции по психологии мотивов человека: учеб. пособие для спецкурса. Пермь: Пермский государственный педагогический институт, 1971. 120 с.
9. Трудовой кодекс Российской Федерации. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901807664 (дата обращения: 19.11.2024).
10. Дорофеева Л.И. Социализация как основа эффективной карьеры персонала в организации// Профессиональная ориентация. 2017. № 2. С. 133–138.
11. The cross-level effect of team safety-specific transformational leadership on workplace safety behavior: The serial mediating role of team safety climate and team safety motivation/ D. Wang, W. Mao, C. Zhao et al.// Journal of Safety Research. 2023. Vol. 87. P. 285–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.001
12. Chen S., Cuervo J.C. The influence of transformational leadership on work engagement in the context of learning organization mediated by employees’ motivation// The Learning Organization. 2022. Vol. 29. Iss. 5. P. 567–585. DOI: 10.1108/TLO-01-2022-0011