References:
1. Kirilov A.E., Chernyy K.A., Tagirov A.I., Khasanova F.N. On the Issue of the Structure of Digital Twins of Hazardous Production Facilities. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2022. № 3. pp. 33–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-3-33-40
2. Poroshin A.A., Bobrinev E.V., Udavtsova E.Yu., Kondashov A.A. Dynamic Model for Assessing the State of the Occupational Health and Safety Management System. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 6. pp. 28–33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-6-28-33
3. Pleshko M.S., Shchekina E.V., Ryabova N.V. On the problem of increasing the severity of occupational injuries in machine-building enterprises of the Rostov region. Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona = Engineering Journal of Don. 2017. № 3. pp. 40. (In Russ.).
4. Izmerov N.F. Development of a methodology for calculating the probability of an employee disability depending on the state of working conditions at the workplace: research report (conclusion). Moscow, 2008. 86 p. (In Russ.).
5. Maslenskiy V.V., Lyubetskaya N.A. Calculation of collective risk of foundry professional groups based on the analysis of individual risk of each employee. Bezopasnost tekhnogennykh i prirodnykh sistem = Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2020. № 4. pp. 17–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2541-9129-2020-4-17-23
6. Maslenskiy V.V. Lean Production Technology as an Element of the Professional Risk Management System of the Enterprise. Bezopasnost tekhnogennykh i prirodnykh sistem = Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2019. № 4. pp. 9–12. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2541-9129-2019-4-9-12
7. Granichina O.A. Mathematical models of quality control of the educational process at the university with active optimization. Stokhasticheskaya optimizatsiya v informatike = Stochastic optimization in informatics. 2006. Iss. 2. pp. 77–108. (In Russ.).
8. Taranushina I.I., Popova O.V. Method of Professional Risk Assessment as the Element of Industrial Safety Concept. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 7. pp. 74–80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-7-74-80
9. Dzhilyadzhi M.S., Esipov Yu.V. Formalization and Comparative Analysis of Employees Working Conditions at the Crimean Machine-Building Enterprises based on Occupational Safety Management System 2016. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020. № 6. pp. 60–66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-6-60-66
10. On approval of the Recommendations on the choice of methods for assessing the levels of occupational risks and on reducing the levels of such risks: Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated December 28, 2021, № 796. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/hotlaw/federal/1521904/ (accessed: June 5, 2022). (In Russ.).
11. Denisov O.V., Ponomarev A.E. Innovative Digital Solutions as Occupational Injuries Reduction Factor. Bezopasnost tekhnogennykh i prirodnykh sistem = Safety of Technogenic and Natural System. 2018. № 1–2. pp. 13–20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2541-9129-2018-1-2-13-20
12. Meskhi B.Ch., Bulygin Yu.I., Shchekina E.V., Medvedev A.V. Application of the Method of Construction of Diagram at the Stage of Heat-treatment Shop Design and Reconstruction on Safety Criteria. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 12. pp. 16–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-12-16-22
13. Bulygin Yu.I., Pantuzenko A.A., Lazurenko R.R., Gazgireev A.S. Analysis of Accidents and Injuries in the Operation of Hoisting Machinery in Russia. Bezopasnost tekhnogennykh i prirodnykh sistem = Safety of Technogenic and Natural System. 2018. № 3–4. pp. 2–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23947/2541-9129-2018-3-4-2-17