Emergency Management in Inland Waterway Transport



Annotation:

The relevance of this study is determined by the need to increase the safety level at the waterway transport facilities, on one hand, and by the poorly developed system in the inland waterways, on the other. Therefore, the goal of the study is the development of proposals for emergency management in inland waterway transport. The Russian and international emergency management sources were analyzed in ScienceDirect and Elibrary, which has detected poorly developed problems of the inland waterway transport and unregistered emergencies associated with dry cargo vessels. In accordance with the specifics of inland waterway transport, a control scheme within the emergency elimination functional subsystem in inland waterway transport has been proposed, and its description has been provided. The specific features of inland waterway transport include the registration of types of performed operations (transitions between inland waterway basins; transition within basins or areas of inland waterways; mooring, navigation, and maneuvering in a river port and port approaches). The specified types of operations determine the possibility of practical implementation of emergencies from the same source in different environmental conditions. Since a significant number of water intake areas and specially protected natural territories are located in inland waterways, maps of accident sections within the Russian Federation entities around the Volga basin and located upstream of the areas specified have been drawn by joint application of risk analysis and mapping. Their study has shown a potentially growing risk that an emergency reaches the federal level. Therefore, the specific features of the set of problems of the federal level emergencies in inland waterway transport have been considered.

References:
1. Domnina O.L., Plastinin A.E., Matsenko S.V. Development of a Functional Subsystem to Prevent and Eliminate Consequences of Emergencies in Water Transport. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2024. № 6. pp. 7–14. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24000/0409-2961-2024-6-7-14
2. Cheng Q., Zhang S. Research status and evolution trends of emergency information resource management: based on bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2023. 97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104053
3. Maksimov A.V. Decision Support Methods in Emergency Management: a Review of Research. Natsionalnaya bezopasnost i strategicheskoe planirovanie = National security and strategic planning. 2023. № 2 (42). pp. 91–102. (In Russ.). DOI 10.37468/2307-1400-2023-2-91-102
4. Sheu J.-B. Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E Logistics Transportation Review. 2010. 46 (1) 1–17. DOI:10.1016/j.tre.2009.07.005
5. Kudryavtsev S.S., Emelin P.V., Emelina N.K. Methodology of Risk Assessment for the Environment from Emergencies at the Chemically Hazardous Objects. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2022. № 5. pp. 81–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-5-81-89
6. Nickdoost N., Jalloul H., Choi J. An integrated framework for temporary disaster debris management sites selection and debris collection logistics planning using geographic information systems and agent-based modeling. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022. Vol. 80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103215
7. Tripathy P., Malladi T. Global flood mapper: a novel google earth engine application for rapid flood mapping using sentinel-1 SAR. Natural Hazards. 2022. Vol. 114 (2). pp. 1341–1363. DOI:10.1007/s11069-022-05428-2
8. Reshnyak V., Domnina O., Plastinin A. Evaluating environmental hazards of the potential sources of accidental spills. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 867. Iss. 1. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/867/1/012046
9. Nasar S., Raz S., Parray A.A., Hossain R., Sultana R., Nadim A.s.M., Jabbar A., Aktar B. Bashid S., Rahman M.S. An assessment of gender vulnerability in the humanitarian crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: developing a gender-based vulnerability index in the Rohingya and Host community contexts. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022. Vol. 81. DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103246
10. Domnina O., Plastinin A., Reshnyak V. Assessment of the Risk of Transport Accidents, Considering the Environmental and Operational Components. International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum TransSiberia – 2021. 2022. Vol. 403. pp. 640–649. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96383-5_71
11. Naumov V.S., Kochneva I.B. Analysis of environmental aspects of ship operation during the navigation period. Nauchnye problemy vodnogo transporta = Russian Journal of Water Transport. 2022. № 72. pp. 267–273. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37890/jwt.vi72.302
12. Ali U., Sultani W., Ali M. Destruction from sky: weakly supervised approach for destruction detection in satellite imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2020. Vol. 162. pp. 115–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.002
13. Shao C.W., Li Y.F. Multistage attack-defense graph game analysis for protection resources allocation optimization against cyber attacks considering rationality evolution. Risk Analysis. 2022. 42 (5). pp. 1086–1105. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13837
14. Etin V.L., Zakharov V.N., Sosenkov F.S., Cheban E.Yu. Analysis of the Statutory Acts of the Russian Federation in the Branch Of Oil Spill Prevention in the Inland Water Ways. Neftegazovoe delo = Petroleum Engineering. 2012. Vol. 10. № 1. pp. 112–123. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17122/NGDELO-2012-1-112-123
15. Xing H., Xing L. Key factors and coupling relationships of collaborative governance for disaster prevention in China’s coastal cities. Risk Analysis. 2021. Vol. 41 № 6. pp. 895–910. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13586
16. Yan Y.W., Chen J.F., Wang Z.Y. Mining Public Sentiments and Perspectives from Geotagged Social Media Data for Appraising the Post-earthquake Recovery of Tourism Destinations. Applied Geography. 2020. Vol. 123. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102306
17. Hunt K., Agarwal P., Zhuang J. Monitoring misinformation on twitter during crisis events: a machine learning approach. Risk Analysis. 2022. 42. Iss. 8. pp. 1728–1748. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13634
18. Domnina O.L. Assessment of the risk of environmental and operational consequences from transport accidents with dry cargo ships (on the example of the Volga basin). Morskie intellektualnye tekhnologii = Marine intellectual technologies. 2022. № 2. Pt. 1. pp. 218–225. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37220/MIT.2022.56.2.029
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2025-1-59-66
Year: 2025
Issue num: January
Keywords : emergency situations functional subsystems inland waterway transport emergency management control scheme mapping of accident sections
Authors:
  • Domnina O.L.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assos. Prof., o-domnina@yandex.ru, Volga State University of Water Transport, N. Novgorod, Russian Federation
  • Plastinin A.E.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Volga State University of Water Transport, N. Novgorod, Russian Federation