Development of a Functional Subsystem to Prevent and Eliminate Consequences of Emergencies in Water Transport



Annotation:

The relevance of the study is based on the need to improve the Unified State System of Prevention and Elimination of Emergencies in order to increase the safety level in case of accidents of natural and anthropogenic origins in water transport industry facilities. In the field of functional subsystems of water transport, the focus is made on eliminating marine and internal waterway oil and petroleum product spills as well as the search and rescue operations during marine emergencies. At the same time, the scope of emergencies in water transport that can be environmentally hazardous is more extensive and includes fires and explosions, discharges of non-petroleum dangerous goods (for example, coal, sulfur, chemical goods, etc.)

The Unified State System is regulated in conditions of insufficient scientific substantiation of the principles of construction, organization, and use of functional subsystems. Therefore, the study aims to substantiate the necessity to establish and develop structural schemes of a new functional subsystem that includes functioning modes, management bodies, responsibility levels, logistical and financial support. For this purpose, the existing functional subsystems have been analyzed, and the development of an integral functional subsystem to prevent and eliminate emergencies in water transport has been proposed. Methods of decomposition of emergencies and generalization of information on the operation of other transports as well as the analysis of regulatory legal acts outlining certain issues of the operation of these functional subsystems have been used. 

The characteristics to determine the extent of emergency danger have been formulated; the detailed characteristics of levels of a functional subsystem to prevent and eliminate a wide range of various emergencies have been provided based on the example of marine water transport; the subsystem tasks for various levels of emergency have been formulated.

References:
1. Matsenko S., Matsenko I., Koshelev A., Lavrov V., Gamidov R., Vysotskiy K. Elimination of ship accidents: not only oil spills. Morskoy flot = Maritime fleet. 2015. № 2. pp. 44–51. (In Russ.).
2. Cheban E.Yu., Ivanov V.M., Kuzmichev A.I. Technical and economic evaluation of the oil spills response subsystem implementation in the russian inland waterways. Problemy ispolzovaniya i innovatsionnogo razvitiya vnutrennikh vodnykh putey v basseynakh velikikh rek. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-promyshlennogo foruma «Velikie reki». (Problems of use and development of internal waterways in the great rivers basins. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Industrial Forum «Great Rivers»). Nizhniy Novgorod: FGBOU VO «VGUVT», 2017. Iss. 6. P. 17. (In Russ.).
3. Etin V.L., Zakharov V.N., Sosenkov F.S., Cheban E.Yu. Analysis of regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation for oil spill elimination in inland water transport. Neftegazovoe delo = Petroleum Engineering. 2012. Vol. 10. № 1. pp. 112–123. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17122/ngdelo-2012-1-112-123
4. Reshnyak V., Domnina O., Plastinin A. Evaluating environmental hazards of the potential sources of accidental spills. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 867. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/867/1/012046
5. Cheng Q., Zhang S. Research status and evolution trends of emergency information resource management: Based on bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2023. Vol. 97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104053
6. Maksimov A.V. Decision support methods in emergency management: a review of research. Natsionalnaya bezopasnost i strategicheskoe planirovanie = National security and strategic planning. 2023. № 2 (42). pp. 91–102. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37468/2307-1400-2023-2-91-102
7. Korolev О.А. Automated information management system of monitoring of emergencies in automotive transport: thesis … Candidate of Technical Sciences. Saint Petersburg, 2022. 188 p. (In Russ.).
8. Xing H., Xing L. Key factors and coupling relationships of collaborative governance for disaster prevention in China’s coastal cities. Risk Analysis. 2021. Vol. 41. № 6. pp. 895–910. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13586
9. Galishev M.A., Pustovalova N.S. Application of the Headspace Analysis Method for Studying the Distribution of Volatile Components of Organic Pollutants between the Soil and Atmospheric Air. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2022. № 3. pp. 26–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-3-26-32
10. Kudryavtsev S.S., Yemelin P.V., Yemelina N.K. Methodology of Risk Assessment for the Environment from Emergencies at the Chemically Hazardous Objects. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2022. № 5. pp. 81–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-5-81-89
11. Makarova I., Makarov D., Buyvol P.,  Barinov A.,  Gubacheva L., Mukhametdinov E., Mavrin V. Arctic Development in Connection with the Northern Sea Route: A Review of Ecological Risks and Ways to Avoid Them. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022. Vol. 10. Iss. 10. DOI: 10.3390/jmse10101415
12. Naumov V.S., Kochneva I.B. Analysis of environmental aspects of ship operation during the navigation period. Nauchnye problemy vodnogo transporta = Russian Journal of Water Transport. 2022. № 72. pp. 267–273. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37890/jwt.vi72.302
13. Domnina O., Plastinin A., Reshnyak V. Assessment of the Risk of Transport Accidents, Considering the Environmental and Operational Components. International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum TransSiberia – 2021. Vol. 403. Ser. «Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems». 2022. Vol. 2. pp. 640–649. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96383-5_71
14. Domnina O., Plastinin A., Reshnyak V. Organization of Purification of Oil Bilge Water in the Operation of Inland Navigation Vessels. International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum TransSiberia – 2021. Vol. 403. Ser. «Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems». 2022. Vol. 2. pp. 659–667. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96383-5_73
15. Häkkinen J., Malk V., Posti A., Penttinen O-P., Mäkelä R., Kiiski A. Environmental risk assessment of the most commonly transported chemicals: case study of Finnish coastal areas. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2013. Vol. 12. pp. 147–160. DOI: 10.1007/S13437-013-0046-5
16. Shao Ch, Yang J., Tian X., Ju M., Huang L. Integrated Environmental Risk Assessment and Whole-Process Management System in Chemical Industry Parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013. № 10. pp. 1609–1630. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10041609

DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2024-6-7-14
Year: 2024
Issue num: June
Keywords : hazardous production facilities emergency situations water transport functional subsystems prevention and elimination of consequences
Authors:
    ;
  • Domnina O.L.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assos. Prof., o-domnina@yandex.ru, Volga State University of Water Transport, N. Novgorod, Russian Federation
  • Plastinin A.E.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Volga State University of Water Transport, N. Novgorod, Russian Federation
  • Matsenko S.V.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), General Director, JSC Southern Research and Design Institute named after the Soviet Union Marine Fleet Admiral I.S. Isakov, Novorossiysk, Russian Federation