Reducing the Occupational Burnout Level on the Basis of Personal Characteristics at Working Group Organizing


Complex conditions at work places cause exhaustion of psychological and physiological resources of a human, which affects employee’s efficiency. 

The occupational burnout syndrome, by a number of signs, is similar to the emotional burnout, however, its source is a situation at work. The phenomenon includes a set of negative emotions and experiences directly associated with work.  

The basic signs of occupational burnout are as follows: the feeling of eternally deep fatigue, overwhelming exhaustion, cynical and indifferent attitude to colleagues, disappointment in one’s own work results, and depreciation of one’s own expertise. One might think that he/she works insufficiently, then gradually the disappointment grows and causes anxiety and complete exhaustion. When unattended, these emotional disorders develop into severe diseases. 

The occupational burnout is a phenomenon that recently became of focus of research of various disciplines, from psychology to labor protection. With the other occupational deceases caused by hazardous factors of production environment, the occupational burnout as a result of the effects of stress on human organism leads to decreasing work efficiency, is harmful for employee’s health and may cause illnesses. Employee’s adaptation to occupational requirements is associated with development of useful personal characteristic and suppression of those hampering one’s professional functioning. Such changes affect the psychological and emotional condition of an employee. 

In order to determine the recommendations how to overcome stress at work, the level of occupational burnout of 14 employees of a design & construction bureau was conducted via using V.V. Boiko’s test «The diagnostics of emotional burnout level» modified by E.P. Ilyin.

1. Zapf D., Kern M., Tschan F., Holman D., Semmer N.K. Emotion Work: A Work Psychology Perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2021. Vol. 8. pp. 139–172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062451
2. Overfatigue prevention. Available at: (accessed: November 18, 2020). (In Russ.).
3. Derbin P.A. Social and psychological technologies of stress-resistance development for military officers. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in current natural sciences. 2012. № 6. pp. 213–214. (In Russ.).
4. Merzlyakova D.R., Miroshnichenko A.A. Influence of the Professional Burnout and Depression on Occupational Safety, their Comprehensive Prevention. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020. № 8. pp. 68–73. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-8-68-73
5. Freudenberger H.J. Staff Burn-Out. Journal of Social Issues. 1974. Vol. 30. pp. 159–165.
6. Heinemann L.V., Heinemann T. Burnout Research: Emergence and Scientific Investigation of a Contested Diagnosis. Sage Journals. 2017. Vol. 7. Iss. 1. pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/2158244017697154
7. Shteyngardt A. «One literally forgets how to breathe»: why burnout among top-managers is crucially dangerous for a company. Available at: (accessed: November 18, 2020). (In Russ.).
8. Vodopyanova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Syndrome of burnout: diagnostics and prevention. 3‑e izd., ispr. i dop. Мoscow: Yurayt, 2017. 343 p. (In Russ.).
9. Vodopyanova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Syndrome of burnout: diagnostics and prevention. 2-е izd. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 258 p. (In Russ.).
10. Platonov Yu.P. Phenomenon of the emotional burnout of a personality: structuraland functionalanalysis. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsialnoy raboty = Scientific Notes Journal of St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work. 2018. Vol. 29. № 1. pp. 7–13. (In Russ.).
11. Garanyan N.G., Sharapova A.V., Sorokova M.G., Mikita O.Yu., Boyko S.L. Translation, approbation, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the russian version of the job anxiety scale by B. Muschalla and M. Linden (JAS). Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2020. Vol. 28. № 4. pp. 9–34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280402 
12. Zaki J. Integrating Empathy and Interpersonal Emotion Regulation. Annual Review of Psychology. 2020. Vol. 71. pp. 517–540. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050830
13. Samoukina N.V. The stressless career. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2003. 256 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kozina N.V., Chutko L.S. The syndrome of emotional burnout. Clinical and psychological aspects. Мoscow: MEDpress-inform, 2016. 256 p. (In Russ.).
15. Matyushkina E.Ya., Roy A.P., Rakhmanina A.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Occupational stress and burnout among healthcare professionals. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2020. Vol. 9. № 1. pp. 39–49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2020090104
16. Narusova E.Yu., Struchalin V.G., Stepanov A.N. Determination of the Required Personal Qualities of a Leader for Ensuring Safe Work of the Employees. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 8. pp. 91–95. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-8-91-95
17. Ilyin E.P. The motivation and the motives. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2006. 508 p. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-9-45-49
Year: 2021
Issue num: September
Keywords : personal qualities industry safe labor professional burnout stress resistance psychological types