Systematic Approach to the Assessment of Production Control Functioning at Hazardous Production Facilities of Oil and Gas Industry

Annotation:

One of the main causes of accidents at hazardous production facilities of oil and gas production is the inefficient work of production control over compliance with industrial safety requirements. At present there are no criteria for its assessment in the Russian legislation.
It is established in the study that that production control in the industrial safety management system performs the role of «control» in accordance with the Shewhart-Deming cycle PDCA, and its main function is to work with nonconformities. In connection with the above, it is proposed to approach production control not only from the point of view of the process, but also from the system approach.
To assess the system functioning, the criteria of «effectiveness», «efficiency», «integral indicator» are considered. It is established that from the point of view of proactivity in achieving the goals of production control, the most preferable is the assessment of the integral indicator of the production control system functioning.
The considered existing and possible approaches to the assessment of the production control system and the statistical processing of the results of the expert assessment of nineteen parameters confirmed the need for a systematic approach. Based on this, the hypothesis of the production control system functioning is proposed and statistically substantiated, and four main parameters for calculating the integral indicator of the production control system functioning are considered.
The built mathematical model based on the fuzzy logic clearly demonstrates the dependence of the integral indicator of the production control system functioning on the considered input parameters. The proposed proactive approach to the assessment of the production control system through nonconformity management is universal and applicable to the «control» function of any control system. It can also be used in the work of Rostechnadzor and be an incentive for enterprises to improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of the production control system.

References:

| 1. Annual reports on the activity of the Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service. Available at: http://www.gosnadzor.ru/public/annual_reports/ (accessed: January 10, 2021). (In Russ.). 2. Klimova I.V., Smirnov Yu.G., Fatkhutdinov R.I. Application of Fuzzy Modeling Methods for Assessment of the Industrial Control Efficiency. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 2. pp. 54–59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-2-54-59 3. Podgorski D. Measuring operational performance of OSH management system — A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Available at: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0925753514003063?token=15C04FF6C79F8483123F4CFF3FAE012217064A3652F559AFB8F3389CD17996CDFE6E108DDF76239331BC9E492AC43B79 (accessed: January 10, 2021). DOI: 1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018 4. Vranješ B., Todić M., Golubović-Bugarski V. Optimizing the Management of the Occupational Safety and Health System in «ArcelorMittal» Prijedor on the Basis of Performance Indicators. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=347062 (accessed: January 10, 2021). 5. On the organization and implementation of industrial control over compliance with industrial safety requirements: Decree of the Russian Federation Government of December 18, 2020 № 2168. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/400020660/ (accessed: January 10, 2021). (In Russ.). 6. Methodology for determining the Risk-oriented integral indicator of industrial safety (ROII IS). Available at: https://gpmliftservis.ru/uploads/files/20180409-120157.pdf (accessed: January 10, 2021). (In Russ.). 7. Fatkhutdinov R.I. Analysis of the standards of oil producing companies on the organization and implementation of production control over compliance with industrial safety requirements at the hazardous production facilities. Identification of positive and negative sides. Materialy XVI Mezhdunar. molodezhnoy nauch. konf. «Severgeoekotekh – 2015» (Materials of the Sixteen International Youth Scientific Conference «Severgeoecotech – 2015»). In 6 parts. Pt. 4. Ukhta: FBOU VPO «UGTU», 2015. pp. 57–61. (In Russ.). 8. Pantyukhova Yu.V. Methodology for assessing the level of industrial safety of hazardous production facilities of gas distribution and gas consumption systems: abstract of a thesis ... Candidate of Technical Sciences. Мoscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2011. 25 p. (In Russ.). 9. Shlimovich Yu., Gusev A. Improve the efficiency of production control. TekhNadzor = TechNadzor. 2013. Vol. 6. № 79. pp. 54–55. (In Russ.). 10. Buyko K.V., Pantyukhova Yu.V. Approaches to Assessment of Industrial Safety Level in the Companies Operating Hazardous Production Facilities. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2010. № 10. pp. 42–46. (In Russ.). 11. Fruchtnicht E., Fellers J.W., Hanks C.D. Safety Inspections: Continuous Improvement, Effectiveness & Efficiency. Professional Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. Iss. 7. pp. 28–35. 12. Li L., Singleton P. The Effect of Workplace Inspections on Worker Safety. Available at: https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1233&context=cpr (accessed: January 10, 2021). 13. Fatkhutdinov R.I. Ranging of Violations of Industrial Safety and Occupational Health and Safety Requirements as a Tool to Increase the Safety of Hazardous Production Facilities of Oil and Gas Production. Neftegazovoe delo = Oil and Gas Business. 2018. № 3. pp. 110–130. (In Russ.).

Подписаться на автора Fatkhutdinov R.I.