The most crucial aspect of the safe operation of a hazardous production facility is compliance with the industrial safety requirements established by the Federal Law № 116-FZ «On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities», federal norms and rules for industrial safety, and other documents that regulate ensuring industrial safety. Therefore, different types of devices, whose integrity and reliability must also be ensured, are used at hazardous production facilities.
The matters of determination of inter-inspectional intervals are considered; Russian and international regulatory documents as to the inspection of safety devices are reviewed. The algorithm takes into account the following factors of safety device operation: working environment, corrosiveness, exposure of a safety device to vibration and pulsation, and the criticality of a safety device for personnel’s and production safety.
The frequency of inspection of safety devices in accordance with the proposed algorithm does not contradict the maximum permissible intervals stipulated in API 510, API 576, and NBIC-2015; at the same time, conservatism and objectivity are preserved when determining the criticality.
A direct-acting spring safety valve of direct action DN 25/50, PN20, used at hazardous production facilities of oil and gas refinery plants has been selected as an object of research. According to the calculations, the inter-inspectional interval under IPKM—2005 is 36 months (3 years), under API 510/576 is 120 months (10 years), and under the proposed algorithm is 48 months (4 years).
Therefore, the proposed algorithm implies qualitative risk analysis that considers operating conditions of safety devices, which requires a high level of expertise and skills from inspecting persons. It is based on the risk assessment, which does not contradict the effective regulatory documents of the Russian Federation and therefore can be applied at hazardous production facilities. Determining frequency in accordance with the proposed algorithm will help improve the economic efficiency of operating companies and ensure an acceptable level of industrial safety.
2. Brikov A.V., Aleksandrovich S.I., Klimova I.V. Calculation of Inspection Interval for Spring Safety Valve Using Risk-Based Approach According to Api Rp 581 Methodology. Gazovaya promyshlennost = Gas industry. 2023. № 11. pp. 116–127. (In Russ.).
3. Aleksandrovich S.I., Shevel I.A., Brikov A.V., Klimova I.V., Priymachuk S.P. The Algorithm for Assessment of Consequences of Failure of a Process Pipeline by the API RP 581 3rd Edition Methodology (Level 1). Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2024. № 5. pp. 59–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2024-5-59-68
4. TRCU 010/2011. On the safety of machines and equipment. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902307904?ysclid=m2hjp20nrc10887641 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
5. TRCU 012/2011. On the safety of equipment for operations in explosive media. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902307910 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
6. TRCU 032/2013. On the safety of equipment operated under overpressure. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/499031170?ysclid=m2hjm5tl76379877856 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
7. On approval of the federal norms and rules for industrial safety «General rules of explosion safety for explosive chemical, petrochemical and oil-refining plants»: the Order of Rostechnadzor of December 15, 2020, № 533. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573200380 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
8. On approval of the federal norms and rules for industrial safety «Industrial safety rules for the use of equipment operated under overpressure»: the Order of Rostechnadzor of December 15, 2020, № 536. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573275722 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
9. On approval of the federal norms and rules for industrial safety «Safety rules for liquefied natural gas facilities»: the Order of Rostechnadzor of December 11, 2020, № 521. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573140265 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
10. On the approval of the federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety «Rules for the safe operation of technological pipelines»: Order of Rostechnazdor dated December 21, 2021 № 444. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/
View/0001202206010001 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
11. GOST 31294—2005. Direct-acting safety valves. General specifications. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200063943 (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
12. Instruktsiya Ipkm—2005. Spring Safety Valves, Membrane Safety Devices Operation, Inspection and Repair Procedure for Oil Refining and Petrochemical Companies of the Russian Federation Industry and Energy Ministry. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/70845112/ (accessed: January 13, 2025). (In Russ.).
13. API 510. Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-Service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration. American Petroleum Institute. Available at: https://www.api.org/ (accessed: January 13, 2025).
14. API RP 576. Inspection of Pressure-Relieving Devices. American Petroleum Institute. Available at: https://www.api.org/ (accessed: January 13, 2025).
15. NBIC—2015. NATIONAL BOARD INSPECTION CODE. The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Available at: https://www.nationalboard.org/ (accessed: January 13, 2025).
16. Mitchell E.M., Gross R.E., Stephen P. Harris Evaluation of Maintenance Intervals for Spring-Operated Relief Valves Using a Risk-Based Inspection Technique. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME. 2012. DOI: 10.1115/1.4005940
17. Henry Ph. A., Magyari V., Baham D. Risk Based Method to Establish Inspection Intervals for Pressure Relief Devices. Inspectioneering Journal. 2010. Available at: https://inspectioneering.com/journal/2010-05-01/153/risk-based-method-to-establish (accessed: January 13, 2025).
18. Natawijaya M.F., Khusnun W. Risk Assessment on Pressure Relief Device Using Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Method Based on API RP 581 in PT. Z. Journal of Emerging Supply Chain, Clean Energy, and Process Engineering. 2022. Vol. 1. № 2. pp. 127–134. DOI: 10.57102/jescee.v1.i2.16
19. Lee Sh., Barros A, Lundteigen M.A., Paltrinieri N. A Risk Aspect of Periodic Testing on Pressure Relief Valves. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2022. Vol. 90. DOI: 10.3303/CET2290025
20. Cană P., Ripeanu R.G., Diniță A., Tănase M., Portoacă A.I., Iulian P. A Review of Safety Valves: Standards, Design, and Technological Advances in Industry. Processes. 2025. 13 (1). DOI: 10.3390/pr13010105