A.B. Nikolaev, Director, ab@povedenie.ru ANO Institute of Behavior, Moscow, Russia
The human factor is one of the main reasons of the up-to-date technogenic accidents and disasters. In the article, the system approach is proposed concerning the study of the manifestation of the human factor and its influence on the professional activity based on the physiology regularities from the point of view of functional system theory developed by P.K. Anokhin and K.V. Sudakov. The author considered the role of the personal acquired characteristic of the employee — avoidance motivation and the accompanying psychoemotional stress as one of the fundamental reasons of manifestation of the human factor negative influence.
The specific methods of diagnostics and reorganization of the psychoemotional stress is described. Using the questionnaire «Self-diagnostics of life-sustaining activity efficiency» the assessment and the statistical analysis of the value and structure of psychoemotional stress before and after correction were carried out. Rehabilitation was conducted based on the methodical recommendations «The method of psychoemotional stability achievement through reorganization of psychoemotional stress for the employees of nuclear, oil and gas industries working in special conditions and in the conditions of the enhanced personal responsibility». After correction, there was high-reliable reduction of value of psychoemotional stress more than 2.5 times. The acquired psychoemotional stability results in decrease of the probability of the human factor manifestation. The obtained positive results enable to make the proposal for revising the attitude to the human factor and to transfer it to the category of the main reasons of hazardous event with the possibility of eliminating it.
1. Liberman A.N. Tekhnogennaya bezopasnost: chelovecheskiy faktor (Technogenic Safety: the Human Factor). Saint-Petersburg: Tsentr informatiki «Gamma-7», 2006. 101 p.
2. Mashin V.A. Formation and development of safety culture at the nuclear power plants. Elektricheskie stantsii = Electrical Power Plants. 2016. № 8. pp. 2–9.
3. Osnovnye printsipy ucheta chelovecheskogo faktora v rukovodstve po tekhnicheskomu obsluzhivaniyu vozdushnykh sudov (Basic Principles of Considering the Human Factor in the Aircrafts Maintenance Manual). Montreal: International Association of Civil Aviation, 2010. 230 p.
4. Mashin V.A. On the violations in nuclear power plants operation caused by the human factor. Elektricheskie stantsii = Electric Power Plants. 2012. № 3. pp. 9–15.
5. Cole K.S., Stevens-Adams S.M., Wenner C.A. A Literature Review of Safety Culture. Sandia National Laboratories. 2013. Available at: http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2013/132754.pdf (accessed: August 10, 2017).
6. Anokhin P.K. Printsipialnye voprosy obshchey teorii funktsionalnykh sistem (Fundamental Issues of Functional Systems General Theory). Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 61 p.
7. Sudakov K.V. Dominiruyushchaya motivatsiya (Dominate Motivation). Moscow: Izd-vo RAMN, 2004. 236 p.
8. Sudakov K.V. Izbrannye trudy. V 3 t. T. 3. Emotsii i emotsionalnyy stress. (Selectas. In 3 books. B. 3. Emotions and Emotional Stress). Moscow: GU NII normalnoy fiziologii im. P.K. Anokhina RAMN, 2012. 534 p.
9. Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsiy) (Psychology of Emotional Stress (Analysis of Overcoming Critical Situations)). Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1984. 200 p.
10. Kotov A.V., Novikova A.P. Special properties of the dominate motivation as the central component of educational activities. Fiziologiya i psikhofiziologiya motivatsiy: mezhregionalnyy sb. nauch. rabot (Physiology and Psychophysiology of Motivations: Interregional Collection of the Scientific Papers). Voronezh: IPTs VGU, 2007. Iss. 8. pp. 15–21.
11. Vorobieva E.V. Intellekt i motivatsiya dostizheniya: psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhogeneticheskie prediktory (Mentality and Motivation to Achieve: Psychophysiological and Psychogenetic Predictors). Moscow: KREDO, 2006. 288 p.
12. Nikolaev A.B., Klimenko T.V., Sudakov S.K. Samodiagnostika koeffitsienta poleznogo deystviya «KPD» zhiznedeyatelnosti (Efficiency Self-diagnostics «EFFICIENCY» Life-sustaining Activity). Moscow: Evropeyskie poligraficheskie sistemy, 2013. 48 p.
13. Sudakov K.V., Kuzichev I.A., Nikolaev A.B. Evolyutsiya terminologii i skhem funktsionalnykh sistem v nauchnoy shkole P.K. Anokhina (Evolution of Terminology and Functional Systems Diagrams at the P.K. Anokhin Academic School). Moscow: Evropeyskie poligraficheskie sistemy, 2010. 240 p.
14. Samodiagnostika organizma (Body Self-diagnostics). Available at: http://www.darvin-da.ru (accessed: August 10, 2017).
15. Rebrova O.Yu. Statisticheskiy analiz meditsinskikh dannykh. Primenenie paketa prikladnykh programm STATISTICA (Medical Data Statistical Analysis. Application of Application Software Program STATISTICA). Moscow: MediaSfera, 2000. 312 p.
16. Ukhtomskiy A.A. Dominanta (Dominance). Leningrad: Nauka, 1966. 272 p.
17. Doroshenko V.A., Zhartaev E.M., Sekacheva A.A. «Safety culture» as technosphere and sociocultural paradigm. Shestaya ezhegodnaya konf. kafedry Istorii nauki i tekhniki «Istoriya nauki i tekhniki v sovremennoy sisteme znaniy» (Sixth Annual Conference of the History of Science and Technology Department «History of Science and Technology in Up-to-date System of Knowledge»). Ekaterinburg: UMTs UPI, 2016. pp. 43–48.
18. Glossariy MAGATE po voprosam bezopasnosti. Terminologiya, ispolzuemaya v oblasti yadernoy bezopasnosti i radiatsionnoy zashchity (IAEA Glossary on Safety Issues. Terminology Used in the Field of Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection). Vena: MAGATE, 2007. 295 p.
19. Blanch P.M. Safety Culture is not Possible without Regulatory Compliance. 2013. Available at: http://allthingsnuclear.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/20130900-blanch-regulatory-compliance-report-.pdf (accessed: August 10, 2017).
