References:
1. Efimov V.I., Rybak L.V. Production and environment: textbook. Мoscow: MGGU, 2012. 301 p. (In Russ.).
2. Efimov V.I. Fundamentals of nature management: textbook. Мoscow: MGGU, 2004. 186 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gridin V.G., Efimov V.I. Production and environment: lectures on the course — Production and environment. Мoscow: MGGU, 2011. 227 p. (In Russ.).
4. Ige O.E., Olanrewaju O.A., Duffy K.J., Obiora C. A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129213
5. Schakel W., Hung C.R., Tokheim L.-A., Strømman A.H., Worrell E., Ramírez A. Impact of fuel selection on the environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping applied to a cement plant. Applied Energy. 2018. Vol. 210. pp. 75–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.123
6. Mikulčić H., Cabezas H., Vujanović M., Duić N. Environmental Assessment of Different Cement Manufacturing Processes Based on Emergy and Ecological Footprint Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 130. pp. 213–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.087
7. Weiguo Shen, Liu Cao, Qiu Li, Zhaijun Wen, Jing Wang, Yun Liu, Rui Dong, Yu Tan, Rufa Chen. Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 131. pp. 20–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.082
8. Information and technical guide to the best available technologies «Manufacture of cement». Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200128666 (accessed: Febuary 9, 2022). (In Russ.).
9. Mahapatra S.K., Schoenher T., Jayaram J. An assessment of factors contributing to firms’ carbon footprint reduction efforts. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021. Vol. 235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108073
10. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated April 22, 2015, № 716-r. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201504270018 (accessed: November 27, 2021). (In Russ.).
11. On the approval of instructions and guidelines for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions by the organizations engaged in the economic and other activities in the Russian Federation: Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation of June 30, 2015 № 300. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201512170023 (accessed: November 27, 2021). (In Russ.).
12. Korobova O.S., Mikhina T.V. Inventory of the greenhouse gas emissions from the cement production. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. Otdelnyy vypusk № 3 «Ekologiya i ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya» = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. Separate Issue № 3 «Ecology and Economics of the Environmental Management». 2008. pp. 253–265. (In Russ.).
2. Efimov V.I. Fundamentals of nature management: textbook. Мoscow: MGGU, 2004. 186 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gridin V.G., Efimov V.I. Production and environment: lectures on the course — Production and environment. Мoscow: MGGU, 2011. 227 p. (In Russ.).
4. Ige O.E., Olanrewaju O.A., Duffy K.J., Obiora C. A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129213
5. Schakel W., Hung C.R., Tokheim L.-A., Strømman A.H., Worrell E., Ramírez A. Impact of fuel selection on the environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping applied to a cement plant. Applied Energy. 2018. Vol. 210. pp. 75–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.123
6. Mikulčić H., Cabezas H., Vujanović M., Duić N. Environmental Assessment of Different Cement Manufacturing Processes Based on Emergy and Ecological Footprint Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 130. pp. 213–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.087
7. Weiguo Shen, Liu Cao, Qiu Li, Zhaijun Wen, Jing Wang, Yun Liu, Rui Dong, Yu Tan, Rufa Chen. Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 131. pp. 20–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.082
8. Information and technical guide to the best available technologies «Manufacture of cement». Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200128666 (accessed: Febuary 9, 2022). (In Russ.).
9. Mahapatra S.K., Schoenher T., Jayaram J. An assessment of factors contributing to firms’ carbon footprint reduction efforts. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021. Vol. 235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108073
10. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated April 22, 2015, № 716-r. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201504270018 (accessed: November 27, 2021). (In Russ.).
11. On the approval of instructions and guidelines for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions by the organizations engaged in the economic and other activities in the Russian Federation: Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation of June 30, 2015 № 300. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201512170023 (accessed: November 27, 2021). (In Russ.).
12. Korobova O.S., Mikhina T.V. Inventory of the greenhouse gas emissions from the cement production. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. Otdelnyy vypusk № 3 «Ekologiya i ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya» = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. Separate Issue № 3 «Ecology and Economics of the Environmental Management». 2008. pp. 253–265. (In Russ.).