References:
1. Gamera Ju.V., Ovcharov S.V., Petrova Ju.Ju. Computational model for determining the areas of exposure from the dynamic effect of a high-speed gas jet. Gazovaja promyshlennost. Spec.vyp. «Promyshlennaja bezopasnost i protivopozharnaja zashhita obektov gazovoj promyshlennosti» = Gas Industry. Special Issue. Industrial Safety and Fire Fighting Protection of Gas Industry Objects. 2014. № S (712). pp. 39–43. (In Russ.).
2. Adibi O., Farhanieh B., Afshin H. Numerical study of heat and mass transfer in underexpanded sonic free jet// International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2017. Vol. 35. № 4. pp. 959–968. DOI: 10.18280/ijht.350432
3. CPR 14E. Methods for the calculation of physical effects (Yellow Book). Part 2. Heat flux from fires. Hague: GevaarlijkeStoffen, 2005. 870 p.
4. Sumskoy S.I., Zaynetdinov S.Kh., Sofyin A.S., Lisanov M.V., Agapov A.A. Simulation of Pressure Waves During Deflagration Combustion of the Clouds of Fuel-Air Mixtures. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2023. № 1. pp. 15–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-1-15-22
5. Gamera Yu.V., Petrova Yu.Yu. Express Method of an Assessment of Fragmental Damage at Emergency Depressurization of the Equipment and Pipelines with Pressurized Gas. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2016. № 4. pp. 71–76. (In Russ.).
6. Gamera Yu.V., Petrova Yu.Yu., Kantyukov R.R., Yagupova L.V. Analysis of the Possibility of an Accident Escalation in the System of the Overhead Multi-Line Gas Pipelines in the Arctic. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 12. pp. 51–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-12-51-57
7. Ramírez-Camacho J.G., Pastor E., Casal J., Amaya-Gómez R., Muñoz-Giraldo F. Analysis of domino effect in pipelines. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2015. Vol. 298. pp. 210–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.033
8. Laheij G.M.H., Chiaradia B., Driessen F., Dröge M.T., Rozendal S., Theune C.J., Spoelstra M.B. Domino effects in pipeline corridors. Pipeline Technology Conference. Berlin, 2017.
9. Mayants, Yu.A. Karpov, S.V. Alikhashkin A.S., Ovcharov S.V. Definition of preliminary test sites and zones protected during trunk pipelines tests. Vesti gazovoy nauki = News of gas science. 2014. № 1 (17). С. 88–92. (In Russ.).
10. Atamanyuk V.G., Shirshev L.G., Akimov N.I. Civil Defense. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1986. 207 p. (In Russ.).
11. Belov S.V., Devisilov V.A., Kozyakov A.F., Morozova L.L., Sivkov V.P., Spiridonov V.S., Yakubovich D.M. Life safety: textbook. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2003. 357 p. (In Russ.).
12. RTM 36.9—88. Guidelines for the design and production of blasting during the reconstruction of industrial enterprises and civil structures. Available at: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data1/10/10345/ (accessed: April 20, 2023). (In Russ.).
13. On Approval of the Safety Guide «Methodological Recommendations for Quantitative Analysis of the Risk of Accidents at Hazardous Production Facilities of Trunk Oil and Oil Product Pipelines»: Rostechnadzor order dated June 17, 2016 № 228. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/456007105 (accessed: April 20, 2023). (In Russ.).
2. Adibi O., Farhanieh B., Afshin H. Numerical study of heat and mass transfer in underexpanded sonic free jet// International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2017. Vol. 35. № 4. pp. 959–968. DOI: 10.18280/ijht.350432
3. CPR 14E. Methods for the calculation of physical effects (Yellow Book). Part 2. Heat flux from fires. Hague: GevaarlijkeStoffen, 2005. 870 p.
4. Sumskoy S.I., Zaynetdinov S.Kh., Sofyin A.S., Lisanov M.V., Agapov A.A. Simulation of Pressure Waves During Deflagration Combustion of the Clouds of Fuel-Air Mixtures. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2023. № 1. pp. 15–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-1-15-22
5. Gamera Yu.V., Petrova Yu.Yu. Express Method of an Assessment of Fragmental Damage at Emergency Depressurization of the Equipment and Pipelines with Pressurized Gas. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2016. № 4. pp. 71–76. (In Russ.).
6. Gamera Yu.V., Petrova Yu.Yu., Kantyukov R.R., Yagupova L.V. Analysis of the Possibility of an Accident Escalation in the System of the Overhead Multi-Line Gas Pipelines in the Arctic. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 12. pp. 51–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-12-51-57
7. Ramírez-Camacho J.G., Pastor E., Casal J., Amaya-Gómez R., Muñoz-Giraldo F. Analysis of domino effect in pipelines. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2015. Vol. 298. pp. 210–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.033
8. Laheij G.M.H., Chiaradia B., Driessen F., Dröge M.T., Rozendal S., Theune C.J., Spoelstra M.B. Domino effects in pipeline corridors. Pipeline Technology Conference. Berlin, 2017.
9. Mayants, Yu.A. Karpov, S.V. Alikhashkin A.S., Ovcharov S.V. Definition of preliminary test sites and zones protected during trunk pipelines tests. Vesti gazovoy nauki = News of gas science. 2014. № 1 (17). С. 88–92. (In Russ.).
10. Atamanyuk V.G., Shirshev L.G., Akimov N.I. Civil Defense. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1986. 207 p. (In Russ.).
11. Belov S.V., Devisilov V.A., Kozyakov A.F., Morozova L.L., Sivkov V.P., Spiridonov V.S., Yakubovich D.M. Life safety: textbook. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2003. 357 p. (In Russ.).
12. RTM 36.9—88. Guidelines for the design and production of blasting during the reconstruction of industrial enterprises and civil structures. Available at: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data1/10/10345/ (accessed: April 20, 2023). (In Russ.).
13. On Approval of the Safety Guide «Methodological Recommendations for Quantitative Analysis of the Risk of Accidents at Hazardous Production Facilities of Trunk Oil and Oil Product Pipelines»: Rostechnadzor order dated June 17, 2016 № 228. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/456007105 (accessed: April 20, 2023). (In Russ.).