The placement of fire detectors in conditions of a protected facility significantly affects the efficiency of the detection of fire factors by fire detectors. Problems of the placement of point-type smoke, heat, and gas fire detectors in premises with engineering structures in the ceiling area located at a certain distance from the ceiling have been considered.
The combustion source generates a convection column that carries fire factors (heat, smoke, and gaseous combustion products), usually with an opening angle of about 15°. Having reached the ceiling, the airflow generated by the convection column starts spreading horizontally in all directions. The horizontal component of the rate of propagation of fire factors depends on the intensity of a combustion source and the distance from the fire source axis.
The process of the spread of fire factors in the ceiling area changes in case of beams, ventilation ducts, and other engineering and technological structures located on the ceiling that protrude from a partition and prevent the spread of fire factors.
It is common that a gap remains between the partition and the upper part of engineering structures, i.e., the engineering structure is not installed directly to the ceiling but at some distance from it. In this case, the main parameters affecting the distribution of fire factors are the height of the gap, the width of the engineering structure, and the horizontal air mass velocity generated by the airflow from the fire source and depending on the intensity of the combustion source. In case of a slowly developing smoldering characterized by the low velocity of airflows, fire factors may not bypass the gap between the engineering structure and the partition, whereas in the case of intensive combustion accompanied by active movement of air masses, the heat, smoke, and gaseous combustion products will pass the gap freely.
The experiments have used five types of point-type smoke fire detectors. The following test fire sources have been used as a combustion load: TF-2A (pyrolysis smoldering of wood) and TF-5 (combustion of a flammable liquid with smoke emission). The test fire source TF-2A generates a lower air mass velocity when compared with the TF-5 source.
A 500 mm wide box simulator has been used as an engineering structure. The first test has been conducted without the box in the ceiling area. Then, the box simulator has been alternatively installed in the ceiling area, creating a gap between the partition and the upper plane of the box of 50, 100, and 200 mm. The test fire source has been placed from one side of the box simulator’s projection to the floor, whereas fire detectors have been installed in the ceiling on the other side of the box simulator. During the tests, the activation time of fire detectors has been controlled. The test results confirm the theoretical conclusions.
2. Technical regulation about requirements of fire safety: the Federal Law of the Russian Federation of July 22, 2008 № 123-FZ. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_78699 (accessed: November 7, 2024). (In Russ.).
3. Types of fire detectors. Available at: https://www.unitest.ru/about/publication/vidy-izveshchateley.html (accessed: November 7, 2024). (In Russ.).
4. Qiang Li. Estimation of Fire Detection Time. Procedia Engineering. 2011. Vol. 11. pp. 233–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.652
5. Khasanov I.R., Karpov A.V., Lobova S.F., Petrova N.V. Field modeling of the fire dynamics as an answer to the question about the fire alarm performance. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost = Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020. Vol. 29. № 5. pp. 40–50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22227/PVB.2020.29.05.40-50
6. Kalmykov S.P., Panov M.V. Influence of the Distance from The Burning Plane of a Fire Seat to the Level of Installation of Fire Detectors on The Estimated Fire Detection Time. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti = Technology of technosphere safety. 2022. Iss. 4 (98). pp. 30–42. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25257/TTS.2022.4.98.30-42
7. Galkin I.A., Lukyanov G.N. Method of increasing the sensitivity of smoke sensors to various sources of smoke. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye problemy tekhniki i tekhnologii = Fundamental and Applied Problems of Engineering and Technology. 2022. № 3 (353). pp. 154–162. (In Russ.).
8. Vasilev M.A., Vasilenko Yu.V., Shenberger A.Yu., Shcheglov E.V. Investigation of the Sensitivity of Smoke Detectors for Firefighters to Aerosols during Thermal Degradation of Various Materials. Voprosy oboronnoy tekhniki. Seriya 16: Tekhnicheskie sredstva protivodeystviya terrorizmu = Military Enginery. Issue 16. Counter-terrorism technical devices. 2020. № 11-12 (149-150). pp. 138–146. (In Russ.).
9. Poroshin A.A., Poponin K.A., Surkov S.A., Koroleva V.V., Sizonova N.A. Technologies for Testing Flow-through Smoke Detectors. Aktualnye problemy pozharnoy bezopasnosti. Materialy XXXIII Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoy Godu nauki i tekhnologiy (Current problems of fire safety. Proceedings of the 33rd International Scientific & Practical Conference dedicated to the Year of Science and Technologies). Moscow: VNIIPO. 2021. pp. 352–356. (In Russ.).
10. Volkov I.V., Zdor V.L., Poroshin A.A., Surkov S.A. Fire Tests of Smoke Fire Detectors. Pozharnaya bezopasnost = Fire Safety. 2024. № 4 (117). pp. 51–58. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37657/vniipo.pb.2024.117/4/005
11. GOST 34698—2020. Fire detectors. General technical requirements. Test methods. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200180194 (accessed: November 7, 2024). (In Russ.).
12. SP 484.1311500.2020. Fire alarm systems and automation of fire protection systems. Designing and regulations rules. Available at: https:// docs.cntd.ru/document/566249686 (accessed: November 7, 2024). (In Russ.).