Main Methods of the Blast Waves Parameters Assessment at Emergency Explosions. Principles of Designing Blast Resistant Buildings and Structures



E.E. Nevskaya, Research Associate, e.nevskaya@safety.ru Autonomous Noncommercial Organization «Industrial Risk Research Agency», Moscow, Russia

Annotation:

The problem of buildings and structures blast resistance shall be resolved starting from planning and design stages of hazardous production facility. When designing the structure, which is resistant to explosions, it is first required to determine the value of the blast load falling on it. Majority of approaches to calculation and identification of the excessive pressure profile of the blast wave are based on the empirical equations of Sadovsky, Friedlender, Kinney and Graham. According to the practice of calculations it was established that the methods based on TNT equivalent can be used as an express analysis of the facilities resistance provided that they are located in the middle and far zones. Widely distributed in the Russian Federation were the methods given in the Safety Guide «Methods for assessment of the consequences of accidental explosions of fuel and air mixtures», which allow to consider the aggregate state and energy characteristics of fuel and air mixture associating the consequences of the steam-and-gas cloud explosion with the specific potentially hazardous substance. In the methods that assess more precisely the consequences of accidental explosion the computational fluid dynamics approach is used to calculate the time intervals for the blast load at the certain points of structure. The instrument for assessment of the manifestation of buildings resistance in relation to explosion is the calculations of object structures for the main and special combination of loads. The calculation of structures for blast waves effect shall be carried out using methods of structural dynamics, in which there are three main directions: numerical methods of high accuracy, approximate dynamic methods and simplified methods of calculation. Main measured reaction criteria are the coefficient of ductility and the angle of turn bending due to the beams load. The calculated values of the deformation parameters must be compared with their limit values to make sure that none of these values is exceeded. An important task in building structure preservation is to prevent progressive collapse. Such a reduction can be achieved by following the basic recommendations on designing of blast resistant structures, which are presented in the article.

References:

1. Kingery C.N., Bulmash G. Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst. Report ARBL-TR-02555. U.S. Army BRL. Aberdeen Proving Ground, 1984.
2. Airblast loading model for DYNA 2D and DYNA 3D by Glenn Randers-Pehrson and Kenneth A. Bannister. CONWEP 2.0. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a322344.pdf (accessed: July 25, 2017).
3. Metodika otsenki posledstviy avariynykh vzryvov toplivno-vozdushnykh smesey: ruk. po bezopasnosti: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 31 marta 2016 g. № 137 (Methods for assessment of the consequences of accidental explosions of fuel and air mixtures: Safety Guide: order of Rostechnadzor of March 31, 2016 № 137). Ser. 27. Iss. 15. Moscow: ZAO NTC PB, 2016. 44 p.
4. Birbrayer A.N., Roleder A.Yu. Ekstremalnye vozdeystviya na sooruzheniya (Extreme Effects on Structures). Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2009. 594 p.
5. Martynyuk V.F. Lektsii po teorii goreniya i vzryva: ucheb. posobie (Lectures on the Theory of Combustion and Explosion: Textbook). Moscow: Izd. tsentr RGU nefti i gaza im. I.M. Gubkina, 2014. 184 p.
6. Rashitov R.F. Obespechenie zashchishchennosti obsluzhivayushchego personala ustanovok neftepererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy ot vozdeystviya udarnoy volny: dis. … kand. tekhn. nauk (Ensuring Protection of the Maintenance Staff of the Units at Oil Processing Enterprises from the Blast Wave Effect: … Candidate of Technical Sciences). Ufa, 2008. 150 p.
7. Sadovsky M.A. Mechanical effect of air blast waves from experimental results. Fizika vzryva = Physics of Explosion. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1952. № 1. pp. 20–110.
8. Bajić Z. Determination of TNT equivalent for various 15. Explosives. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, 2007.
9. Efremov K.V., Lisanov M.V., Sofyin A.S., Samuseva E.A., Sumskoy S.I., Kiriyenko A.P. Calculation of buildings and structures destruction at explosions of fuel and air mixtures at hazardous production facilities. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2011. № 9. pp. 70–77.
10. Kozlitin A.M., Popov A.I., Kozlitin P.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy i praktika analiza tekhnogennykh riskov. Veroyatnostnye metody kolichestvennoy otsenki opasnostey tekhnosfery (Theoretical Bases and Practice of the Analysis of Technogenic risks. Probabilistic Methods of Quantitative Assessment of Technosphere Hazards). Saratov: SGTU, 2002. 178 p.
11. Metody obosnovaniya vzryvoustoychivosti zdaniy i sooruzheniy pri vzryvakh toplivno-vozdushnykh smesey na opasnykh proizvodstvennykh obektakh: ruk. po bezopasnosti: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 13 maya 2015 g. № 189 (Methods of justification of buildings and structures blast resistance at explosions of fuel and air mixtures at hazardous production facilities: Safety Guide: order of Rostechnadzor of May 13, 2015 № 189). Ser. 27. Iss. 17. Moscow: ZAO NTC PB, 2016. 78 p.
12. Degtyarev D.V., Lisanov M.V., Sumskoy S.I., Shvyryaev A.A. Quantitative risk analysis at justification of buildings and structures blast resistance. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2013. № 6. pp. 82–89.
13. Agapova E.A., Degtyaryev D.V., Lisanov M.V., Kryukov A.S., Kulberg S.B., Sumskoy S.I. Comparative analysis of the Russian and foreign methods and computer programs for modeling of emergency emissions and risk assessment. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2015. № 9. pp. 71–78.
14. SNiP 20.13330.2011 (SNiP 2.01.07—85*). Nagruzki i vozdeystviya (SNiP 20.13330.2011 (SNiP 20.01.07—85*). Loads and effects). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200084848 (accessed: July 29, 2017).
15. Rastorguev B.S., Plotnikov A.I., Khusnutdinov D.Z. Proektirovanie zdaniy i sooruzheniy pri avariynykh vzryvnykh vozdeystviyakh (Design of Buildings and Structures at Emergency Blast Effects). Moscow: Izd-vo ASV, 2007. 152 p.
16. Posobie po obsledovaniyu i proektirovaniyu zdaniy i sooruzheniy, podverzhennykh vozdeystviyu vzryvnykh nagruzok (Guidelines on Inspection and Design of Buildings and Structures Subjected to Blast Loads Effect). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200069775 (accessed: July 30, 2017).
17. American Society of Civil Engineers «Design of blast resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities». New York, 2010. 318 p.
18. Nevskaya E.E., Glebova E.V. Analysis of ways and means of increase in level of buildings and structures protection from blast waves effect. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017. № 2. pp. 73–78.
19. Uddin N. Blast Protection of Civil Infrastructures and Vehicles Using Composites. New York, 2010. 488 p.

DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2017-9-20-29
Year: 2017
Issue num: September
Keywords : numerical methods explosion detonation blast loads fuel and air mixture blast overpressure deformation limits fibro-reinforced polymeric materials
Authors:
  • Nevskaya E.E.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Research Assistant, e.nevskaya@safety.ru ANO «Industrial Risk Research Agency», Moscow, Russia