Industrial accidents and incidents are negative indices for the occupational safety management system of a company forcing employers to implement various systems of control and management of unsafe actions of employees. According to various studies, the human factor is the cause of the majority of accidents at production. Unintentional errors or negligent attitudes to work are the causes of unsafe actions of employees. Observation of the indices of unsafe actions of employees, identification of weaknesses, prediction of potential accidents, and the development of preventive measures are the basic factors to ensure occupational safety. In practice, however, the lack of necessary information hampers the implementation of timely preventive measures. Identification and study of unsafe actions of employees will provide the necessary basis for the analysis, prediction, and development of preventive measures to ensure occupational safety. The possibility to apply indices with fuzzy borders as preventive (leading) indicators to eliminate the causes of unsafe actions of employees has been demonstrated.
Control and management of unsafe actions of employees based on fizzy indices will allow for the timely development of preventive measures to ensure occupational safety. Preventive indicators have been considered a database with fuzzy borders to rely on in order to develop measures to improve safety indices. The database will be changing constantly; therefore, the measures applied will be changing as well. This approach will stimulate the establishment of a positive safety culture in a company. The development and implementation of measures to improve indices of preventive indicators significantly increased safety indices in the company in 2023.
2. Utyuganova V.V., Serdyuk V.S., Fomin A.I. Prediction and Assessment of the Occupational Risks in the Mining Industry Using the Bayes's Theorem. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 1. pp. 79–87. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-1-79-87
3. Davydova O.G., Malkov A.V. Human factor as a contemporary issue of industrial safety. Vestnik Rossiyskogo khimiko-tekhnologicheskogo universiteta imeni D. I. Mendelleeva: Gumanitarnye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya = Bulletin of the University of Chemical Technology of Russia named after D.I. Mendeleyev: «Humanitarian and Social-Economic Studies». 2016. № 7–2. pp. 16–23. (In Russ.).
4. Gannesen V.V., Soloveva E.E. The human factor as one of the main causes of accidents. Nauchnye trudy Dalrybvtuza = Scientific Journal of the Far Eastern State Technical Fisheries University. 2022. Vol. 61. № 3. pp. 64–69. (In Russ.).
5. Koroleva A.M., Drobinin K.I., Khayrullina L.B. Characteristics of the Role of the Human Factor in the Analysis of the Causes of Accidents at Hazardous Production Facilities. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo = Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship. 2021. № 11 (136). pp. 1399–1404. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2021.11.136.280
6. Fomin A. I., Osipova A. A. Human factor is the basic safety factor for miners. Sbornik materialov X vserossiyskoy, nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Rossiya molodaya» (Proceedings of the 10th All-Russia Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists with International Participation «Young Russia»). Kemerovo: Kuzbasskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet imeni T.F. Gorbacheva, 2018. pp. 10115.1–10115.5. (In Russ.).
7. Voronova M.A. Method of comprehensive financial analysis based on fuzzy representations. Nauka i obshchestvo v usloviyakh globalizatsii: II Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya (Science and Society in Conditions of Globalization: the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference). Ufa: NITs «NIKA», 2015. № 1 (2). pp. 93–96. (In Russ.).
8. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 1965. Vol. 8. № 3. pp. 338–353.
9. Kosko B. Fuzzy systems as universal approximators. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1994. Vol. 43. № 11. pp. 1329–1333.
10. Hinze J., Thurman S., Wehle A. Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety science. 2013. Vol. 51. Iss. 1. pp. 23–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.016
11. Givehchi S., Hemmativaghef E., Hoveidi H. Association between safety leading indicators and safety climate levels. Journal of Safety Research. 2017. Vol. 62. pp. 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.05.003
12. Pawlowska Z. Using lagging and leading indicators for the evaluation of occupational safety and health performance in industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2015. Vol. 21. Iss. 3. pp. 284–290. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081769
13. Kuleshov V.V., Serdyuk V.S., Fomin A.I. «Proactive Indicators» for Enhancing Safety Culture. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra VostNII po promyshlennoy i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Scientific Centre VostNII for Industrial and Environmental Safety. 2021. №. 3. pp. 59–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25558/VOSTNII.2021.80.89.007
14. Pyramid of accidents. Available at: http://ohsas18000.narod.ru/Pyramid.html (accessed: April 15, 2024). (In Russ.).
15. ISO 45001:2018. Occupational health and safety management systems. Requirements with guidance for use. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/63787.html (accessed: April 15, 2024). (In Russ.).
16. Filimonov V.A. Development and Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Management System based on the ISO 45001:2018 International Standard. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020. № 4. C. 58–67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-4-58-67
17. Konstantayn A. Iso 45001:2018 Standard Implementation: Operation, Evaluation, Improvement. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva = Methods of Quality Management. 2020. № 8. pp. 22–28. (In Russ.).