Study of the Time Characteristics for Emergency Situations in the Coal Mines


The problems directly related to ensuring safety of work in the coal mines are considered. Statistical, technical, and expert analyses was carried out using available research data on the causes and conditions of various underground accidents (methane and coal dust explosions, blockages and collapses, endogenous fires, etc.) at the coal mines in Russia and other coal-producing countries over the past 15 years. The results of studies of natural, technical, and organizational factors of accidents showed that there is a tendency to preserving their number. Possible reasons for a rather high accident rate in the mines, including fatal injuries to personnel, are as follows: insufficient time reserve to escape from the accidents, which, moreover, is not used to the full extent by the mine personnel and management dealing with safety issues during accidents; decisions on establishing the nature and causes of accidents are made on the basis of unreliable information; the development of accidents is influenced by the uncontrollable and beyond control factors. 
Temporary model of the accident development is proposed. In six different accidents, the structural pattern is established, which is expressed as a golden wurf. This fact shows that there is an optimal dependence between the available time margin and the time to recover from an accident of any complexity. Natural, technical, and organizational factors influencing the margin of time for recovery from the accidents are considered. The importance is shown concerning careful filtration of the digital and voice messages content for the mine personnel when analyzing accidents. The concept of filtration procedure is formulated.

1. Kolesnichenko E.A., Artemev V.B., Kolesnichenko I.E. Sudden methane emissions: theoretical foundations. Moscow: Gornoe delo, 2013. 231 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kachurin N.M., Vorobev S.A., Kachurin A.N., Sarycheva I.V. Predication of methane-emission rate in development and production faces of coal mines. Obogashchenie rud = Ore dressing. 2014. № 6. pp. 16–19. (In Russ.).
3. Vorobev S.A., Kachurin N.M. International experience of studies into integrated coal mining with underground method. Gornyy zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2016. № 5. pp. 78–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.05.11
4. Skopintseva O.V., Ganova S.D., Demin N.V., Panichev V.I. Integrated method of dust and gas hazard reduction in coal mines. Gornyy zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2018. № 11. pp. 97–100. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.11.18
5. Kolesnichenko A.E., Artemev V.B., Kolesnichenko E.A., Cherechukin V.G., Lyubomishchenko E.I. Study of the influence of the volatile substances release on the coal dust explosiveness. Ugol = Coal. 2016. № 2.  pp. 50–55. (In Russ.).
6. Lebedev V.S., Skopintseva O.V. Residual coalbed gas components: composition, content, hazard. Gornyy zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2017. № 4. pp. 84–86. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.04.17
7. Smirnyakov V.V., Smirnyakova V.V. Unhandy factors in statistics of accidental gas and dust explosions in coal mines in Russia. Gornyy zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2016. № 1. pp. 30–34. (In Russ.). DOI:
8. Kubrin S.S. Multifunction system to predict hazardous gas-dynamic phenomena in coal mines. Gornyy zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2017. № 11. pp. 97–100. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17580/gzh. 2017.11.18
9. Murashev V.I., Timoshenko A.M., Sukhorukov V.A., Kazantsev V.G., Ermolaev A.M. About analyses of technogeneous accidents with catastrophic effects which took place at coal enterprises in Russia. Vestnik nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti = Bulletin of the Scientific Center for Work Safety in the Coal Industry. 2010. № 1. pp. 55–60. (In Russ.).
10. The Coalmining History Resource Centre. Available at: (accessed: November 4, 2021).
11. Goncharenko A.N. Analysis of innovative higher education programs relevance for various branches of economy. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2018. № 8. pp. 227–233. (In Russ.).  DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2018-8-0-227-233
12. Brune J. The methane-air explosion hazard within coal mine gobs. Mining Engineering. 2014. № 2. pp. 1–7.
13. Jones A.P., Lyle R.R., Wrixon S. Proactive safety programs provided to help protect workers at the face. Available at: (accessed: November 4, 2021).
14. Kavanagh P. Health and safety are about prevention and response. Available at: (accessed: November 4, 2021). 
15. Aristov A.O. Quasi-cellular nets based models of flow systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1392. pp. 1–5.
16. Bise C.J. Modern American Soal Mining: Methods and Applications. Englewood: SME, 2013. 576 p.
17. Kupriyanov V.V., Matskevich O.A., Bondarenko I.S. Parametric and nonparametric models for predicting off-normal situations in underground mines. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2018. № 3. pp. 200–207. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2018-3-0-200-207
18. Kupriyanov V.V. Complexion of forecasts of technological situations with equipment in the coal mine cleaning face. East European Scientific Journal. 2019. № 2. Vol. 42. pp. 25–31. (In Russ.).
19. Beregovoy G.T., Yaropolov V.I., Baranetskiy I.I., Vysokanov V.A., Shatrov Ya.T. Handbook of space flight safety. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1989. 336 p. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-1-39-45
Year: 2022
Issue num: January
Keywords : safety emergency situations prediction explosion coal mines control difficult-to-control factors temporary model hazard assessment