Formalization and Comparative Analysis of Employees Working Conditions at the Crimean Machine-Building Enterprises based on Occupational Safety Management System 2016

For citation.
Dzhilyadzhi M.S., Esipov Yu.V. Formalization and Comparative Analysis of Employees Working Conditions at the Crimean Machine-Building Enterprises based on Occupational Safety Management System 2016. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. — 2020. — № 6. — рр. 60-66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-6-60-66


References:
  1. About the approval of the Standard regulation on the occupational safety management system: Order of Mintrud of Russia dated August 19, 2016 № 438n. Available at:  https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/common/upload/library/2019/07/19.08.2016_438n.pdf (accessed: January 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  2. Ryabinin I.A. Reliability and safety of structurally complex systems. Saint-Petersburg: Politekhnika, 2000. 248 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Pospelov D.A. Situational management: theory and practice. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Dyubua D., Prad A. Theory of opportunity. Applications to the presentation of knowledge in the information technique. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 1990. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Klir Dzh. Systemology. Automation of solving system problems. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 1990. 544 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Bolotin V.V. Statistical methods in structural mechanics. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1965. 279 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Makhutov N.A., Reznikov D.O., Zatsarinnyy V.V. Specific features of statistical approaches in assessing static strength. Bezopasnost v tekhnosfere = Safety in Technosphere. 2014. Vol. 3. № 2. pp. 33–39. (In Russ.).
  8. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965. Vol. 8. pp. 338–353.
  9. Borisov A.N., Alekseev A.V., Merkureva G.V., Slyadz N.N., Glushkov V.I. Fuzzy information processing in decision making systems. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 1989. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Esipov Yu.V., Dzhilyadzhi M.S., Cheremisin A.I. Logical and parametric modeling of preconditions and the establishment of measures of certainty of an incident implementation in the system. Bezopasnost v tekhnosfere = Safety in Technosphere. 2017. Vol. 2. № 6. pp. 3–11. (In Russ.).
  11. Esipov Yu.V., Samsonov F.A., Cheremisin A.I. Monitoring and risk assessment of the systems «protection — object — environment»: monograph. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 136 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Esipov Yu.V., Mishenkina Yu.S., Cheremisin A.I. Models and indicators of technosphere safety: monograph. Moscow: Nauchno-izdatelskiy tsentr INFRA-M, 2018. 154 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Faynburg G.Z., Prosvirnin D.G. Problems of automation and digitalization of occupational risk assessment procedures. Bezopasnost i okhrana trudab = Safety and occupational safety. 2019. № 2. pp. 4–10. (In Russ.).
  14. Khoroshun E.G., Samchuk-Khabarova N.Ya., Esipov Yu.V. Development of the Methodology for the Limits of Acceptable Occupational Risk. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 6. pp. 86–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-6-86-89
  15. Dzhilyadzhi M.S. Development of the unified hazard assessment method for occupational safety management system based on the example of enterprises of the Republic of Crimea: scientific report. Available at: https://ntb.donstu.ru/content/razrabotka-metoda-unificirovannogo-ocenivaniya-opasnostey-dlya-sistemy-upravleniya-ohranoy-truda-na-primere-predpriyatiy-respubliki-krym (accessed: January 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  16. Buslenko N.P. Complex systems modeling. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Gaenko V.P. Modern methods of analysis and safety assessment of complex technical systems. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo NITs BTS, 2004. 212 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Esipov Yu.V. Hazards modeling and establishment of a measure of an incident certainty in the system. Problemy mashinostroeniya i nadezhnosti mashin = Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability. 2003. № 3. pp 112–117. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-6-60-66
Year: 2020
Issue num: June
Keywords : occupational safety working conditions logical model occupational safetу management system formalization comparative analysis linguistic model vertex outcome possible measure
Authors:
  • Dzhilyadzhi M.S.
    Prorector, Lecturer State Public Educational Institution of Higher Education of the Republic of Crimea «Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov», Simferopol, Russia
  • Esipov Yu.V.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., yu-yesipov5@yandex.ru Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia