Empirical Validity of the Method of Remote Measurement of the PsyFace Performance Level in a Smartphone Application


The problem of the implementation of a preventive strategy in reducing the role of the human factor in the accident rate at hazardous production facilities through remote monitoring of the level of employee performance is considered.
The purpose of the study is to establish the empirical validity of the method of operational remote measurement for the performance capacity level of employees with PsyFace smartphone application.
The developed method of operational remote measurement of the PsyFace performance level is based on the modification of Landolt performance diagnostics method under adaptation of V.N. Sysoev. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out in the SPSS Statistics 23 program using the non-parametric r-Spearman rank correlation test. 
Sample: 256 professional drivers (male) aged 22 to 60 years.
The PsyFace method has the necessary empirical validity for diagnosing such performance indicators as productivity, which determines the amount of information processed per unit of time (r = 0.376 at p  0.05), average accuracy, which determines the error-free performance of activities (r = 0.290 at p  0.05) and reliability, which determines the probability of maintaining a given performance for a given time (r = 0.284 at p  0.05).
The PsyFace methodology has great practical potential for its application among employees of hazardous professions and industries and fully complies with the principles of a preventive response strategy to reduce the risks of the human factor, designated by the Russian Ministry of Labor the Russian Federation. The developed PsyFace methodology in a smartphone application can be used by the company management to ensure employee performance monitoring during a work shift, including remotely.

1. Results of monitoring conditions and occupational health and safety in the Russian Federation in 2020. Available at: https://vcot.info/uploads/researches_file/619cbdc415951343985474.pdf (accessed: June 9, 2022). (In Russ.).
2. Bakanov K.S., Lyakhov P.V., Naumov S.B., Nikulin E.D., Sergunova A.S., Isaev M.M. Road traffic accidents in the Russian Federation for 9 months of 2021. Information-analytical review. Moscow: FKU «NTs BDD MVD Rossii», 2021. 39 p. (In Russ.).
3. Medvedeva T.I., Enikolopov S.N., Boyko O.M., Vorontsova O.Yu. The Dynamics of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia. Suitsidologiya = Suicidology. 2020. Vol. 11. № 3 (40). pp. 3–14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32878/suiciderus.20-11-03(40)-3-16
4. Abdullah I. COVID-19: Threat and Fear in Indonesia. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2020. Vol. 12. № 5. pp. 488–490.
5. Golding M.A., Salisbury M.R., Reynolds K., Roos L.E., Protudjer J.L.P. COVID-19-related media consumption and parental mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 2021. Vol. 53. № 3. pp. 371–376. DOI: 10.1037/cbs0000280
6. Liang L., Ren H., Cao R., Hu Y., Qin Z., Li C., Mei S. The effect of COVID-19 on youth mental health. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 91. P. 841–852. DOI: 10.1007/s11126-020-09744-3
7. Taylor S., Landry C.A., Paluszek M.M., Fergus T.A., McKay D., Asmundson G. COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates. Depression and Anxiety. 2020. Vol. 37. Iss. 8. pp. 706–714.
8. Xiong J., Lipsitz O., Nasri F., Lui L., Gill H., Phan L., Chen-Li D., Iacobucci M., Ho R., Majeed A., McIntyre R.S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020. Vol. 277. pp. 55–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001
9. Ermolaev V.V., Voroncova J., Chetverikova A.I., Nasonova D.K. The Vector of Managing the Organizational Culture of the Internal Affairs Bodies: Mental States and the «Picture of the World» of Employees in the Dynamics of Social Fears of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2022. Vol. 13. № 1. pp. 189–208. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/sps.2022130112
10. Finucane A.M. The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. Emotion. 2011. Vol. 11. № 4. pp. 970–974.
11. Gasper K., Clore G.L. Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information. Psychological Science. 2002. Vol. 13. Iss. 1. pp. 34–40.
12. Koretskaya I.A., Kuprina O.A., Manukhina S.Yu. Functional state as an indicator of efficiency of activity. Vestnik Universiteta = Bulletin of the University. 2014. № 9. pp. 264–266. (In Russ.).
13. Levich S.N., Marchenko L.O., Filippova E.O., Kravchenko Yu.V. Psychological stability of military drivers in the course of professional activity. Innovatsii v nauke i praktike: sb. st. po materialam II Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Innovations in science and practice: Collected papers based on the materials of the Second International Scientific-Practical Conference). In 2 parts. Pt. 2. Ufa: OOO «NITs Vestnik nauki», 2020. pp. 160–175. (In Russ.).
14. Ermolaev V.V., Chetverikova A.I., Voroncova J., Nasonova D.K. Simakov A.V. Psychological determinants of aggressive behavior of road passenger transport drivers in the context of their mental states during COVID-19. Natsionalnyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = National Psychological Journal. 2022. № 1 (45). pp. 53–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.11621/npj.2022.0105
15. Ermolaev V.V., Simakov A.V., Chetverikova A.I., Nasonova D.K., Vorontsova Yu. The method for an integral assessment of the test person working efficiency, and the method for assessing concentration of the test person attention. Application for invention RU 2022 103 680 A. Applied: February 14, 2022. Published: June 27, 2022. Bulletin № 18. (In Russ.).
16. Sysoev V.N. Landolt test. Performance capability diagnostics: methodical guide. 2-e izd. Saint-Petersburg: IMATON, 2007. 32 p. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2022-10-86-89
Year: 2022
Issue num: October
Keywords : human factor empirical validity PsyFace performance diagnostics remote monitoring of the functional state preventive response strategy