1. GOST 20911—89. Technical diagnostics. Terms and Definitions. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200009481 (accessed: August 17, 2018). (In Russ.).
2. Makhutov N.A., Gadenin M.M. Technical diagnostics of residual life and safety. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom «Spektr», 2011. 187 p. (In Russ.).
3. Klyuyev V.V. Technical means of diagnostics: Handbook. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1989. 672 p. (In Russ.).
4. GOST R 55045—2012. Technical diagnostics. Acoustic-emission diagnostics. Terms, definitions and designation. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200096172 (accessed: August 17, 2018). (In Russ.).
5. On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities: Federal Law of July 21, 1997 № 116-FZ. Moscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2017. 52 p. (In Russ.).
6. Grazhdankin A.I., Pecherkin A.S., Sidorov V.I. Tolerable Risk — the Measure of Unacceptable Hazard of Industrial Accident. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2015. № 3. pp. 66–70. (In Russ.).
7. API Recommended Practice 580. Risk-based inspection. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/222519671/API-RP-580-Risk-Based-Inspection (accessed: August 17, 2018).
8. API Recommended Practice 581. Risk-Based Inspection Technology. Available at: http://www.irantpm.ir/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/API-581-2008.pdf (accessed: August 17, 2018).
9. Mushik E., Myuller P. Methods of making technical decisions. Moscow: Mir, 1990. 208 p. (In Russ.).
10. Khenli E.Dzh., Kumamoto KH. Reliability of technical systems and risk assessment. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1984. 528 p. (In Russ.).
11. Makhutov N.A. Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovye, socialno-jekonomicheskie i nauchno-tehnicheskie aspekty. Analiz riska i problem bezopasnosti (Safety of Russia. Legal, Social and Economic and Scientific and Technical Aspects. Risk and safety problems analysis). In 4 parts. Part 1. Moscow: Znanie, 2006. 640 p. (In Russ.).
12. Makhutov N.A. Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovye, socialno-jekonomicheskie i nauchno-tehnicheskie aspekty. Analiz riska i problem bezopasnosti (Safety of Russia. Legal, Social and Economic and Scientific and Technical Aspects. Risk and safety problems analysis). In 4 parts. Part 2. Moscow: Znanie, 2006. 752 p. (In Russ.).
13. Makhutov N.A. Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovye, socialno-jekonomicheskie i nauchno-tehnicheskie aspekty. Analiz riska i problem bezopasnosti (Safety of Russia. Legal, Social and Economic and Scientific and Technical Aspects. Risk and safety problems analysis). In 4 parts. Part 3. Moscow: Znanie, 2007. 816 p. (In Russ.).
14. Makhutov N.A. Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovye, socialno-jekonomicheskie i nauchno-tehnicheskie aspekty. Analiz riska i problem bezopasnosti (Safety of Russia. Legal, Social and Economic and Scientific and Technical Aspects. Risk and safety problems analysis). In 4 parts. Part 4. Moscow: Znanie, 2007. 864 p. (In Russ.).
15. Methodological recommendations for conducting quantitative risk analysis of accidents at hazardous production facilities of oil trunk pipelines and oil product pipelines: Safety Guide. Ser. 08. Iss. 24. Moscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2016. 122 p. (In Russ.).
16. RD EO 0489—03. Calculation methods and norms of permissible sizes of defects in welded joints of pipes DU300 KMPTs RBMK. Moscow: Minatom Rossii, 2002. (In Russ.).
17. Shepherd B., Gandossi L., Simola K. Link between Risk-Informed In-Service Inspection and Inspection Qualification. European Network for Inspection and Qualification (ENIQ). Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/ bitstream/JRC51472/eniq%20report%2036%20-%20final.pdf (accessed: August 17, 2018).
18. Ivanov V.I., Konovalov N.N., Kotelnikov V.S., Musatov V.V. On accident risk assessment using technical diagnosis. Kontrol. Diagnostika = Control. Diagnostics. 2015. № 3. pp. 12–14. (In Russ.).
19. Ivanov V.I., Vlasov I.E. About defectometric approaches in ultrasonic testing. Defektoskopiya = Defectoscopy. 1998. № 2. pp. 41–46. (In Russ.).
20. Badalyan V.G., Vopilkin A.Kh. Monitoring of pipelines welded joints using automatic ultrasonic inspection systems with coherent processing of data. Avtomatizirovannyy ultrazvukovoy kontrol obyektov povyshennoy opasnosti: yubileynyy sb. tr. OOO NPTS «EKHO+» (Automated ultrasonic testing of high-risk facilities: the jubilee volume of proceedings of OOO NPTS «EKHO+»). Moscow–Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo «SVEN», 2010. pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).
21. Vopilkin A.Kh. Ultrasonic defectometry of metals using holographic methods. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 2008. 368 p. (In Russ.).
22. Kolesnikov E.Yu., Telyakov E.S. Accidental Risk Quantitative Assessment: Assessment of Parametric Sensitivity of the Models and Conservativeness of the Adopted Assumptions. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 3. pp. 63–67. (In Russ.).
23. Konovalov N.N. Standardization of defects and validity of the welded joints non-destructive testing. Moscow: GUP «NTTs «Promyshlennaya bezopasnost», 2004. 132 p. (In Russ.).
24. Hardie F. Evaluation of the effectiveness of non-destructive testing screening methods for in-service inspection. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/ research/rrpdf/rr659.pdf (accessed: August 17, 2018).
25. IAEA-TECDOC-1400. Improvement of in-service inspection in nuclear power plants. Available at: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ te_1400_web.pdf (accessed: August 17, 2018).
26. Lepikhin A.M., Makhutov N.A., Moskvichev V.V., Chernyayev A.P. Probabilistic risk analysis of technical system constructions. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2003. 174 p. (In Russ.).
27. Edelman V.I. Reliability of technical system constructions: economic assessment. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1988. 151 p. (In Russ.).