Analysis of the Application of the Methods of the Displaced Ideal and the Hierarchy Analysis when Сategorizing the Object of Fuel and Energy Complex

Annotation:

The article deals with the issues of ensuring industrial safety of the objects of fuel and energy complex and hazardous production facilities in other sectors of the national economy. It is recommended to analyze the consequences of emergencies considering the importance of such criteria, as the emergency area, the amount of social damage, the amount of economic damage. At the stage of determining the importance of the above criteria, the study is carried out related to possible scenarios of an emergency development. The importance of the criteria is determined by using the methods of expert evaluations, which allow to use decision-making methods: the method of hierarchy analysis and the method of the displaced ideal. The likely violator will seek to have a destructive impact on the vulnerable areas of hazardous production facilities with the prospect of developing an emergency in scenarios with the most destructive consequences. Therefore, the application of multicriteria optimization methods to predict the development of an emergency, in particular, the method of the displaced ideal and the method of hierarchy analysis, will allow to objectively identify among possible combinations of failures the priority scenario, that a potential internal violator will strive to implement. In turn, the determination of vulnerable for committing an act of unlawful interference (through technical influence by the violator) in the production and technological process will allow the preventive use of the method of physical safety barriers to enhance technological safety. The section of the process flow diagram — isomerization reactor furnace at the organic synthesis facility is considered in the article. 

The method of the displaced ideal and the full method of hierarchy analysis determine the same, the most prioritized combination for the violator.

The software implementation of this approach for determining the priority scenario for the development of an emergency will allow to develop the decision-making technology at hazardous production facilities in matters of ensuring industrial safety within the framework of the strategy for the development of artificial intelligence in industry.

References:
  1. On the categorization of objects of the fuel and energy complex (with amendments and additions): Federal Law of July 21, 2011 № 256-FZ. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/12188188/ (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  2. Methodological recommendations for analyzing the vulnerability of the production and technological process and identifying the critical elements of the object, assessing the socio-economic consequences of committing a terrorist act at the object and the anti-terrorist security of the object during categorization and drawing up a safety data sheet for the object of fuel and energy complex. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/565439310 (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  3. Egorov A.F., Savitskaya T.V. Risk analysis, assessment of accidents consequences and safety management of chemical, oil refining and petrochemical industries: textbook for universities. Мoscow: KolosS, 2010. 526 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Мoscow: Statistika, 1980. 263 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Gubina T.A., Mosolov A.S., Akinin N.I. Algorithm of the method for determining the priority scenario for the development of an emergency at the protected object. Koks i khimiya =Coke and Chemistry. 2019. № 6. pp. 43–51. (In Russ.).
  6. Saati T. Decision making. Analytic hierarchy process. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 1993. 278 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Methodological recommendations for determining the number of victims in emergency situations. Available at: https://rulaws.ru/acts/Metodicheskie-rekomendatsii-po-opredeleniyu-kolichestva-postradavshih-pri-chrezvychaynyh-situatsiyah/ (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  8. RD 03-496—02. Methodological recommendations for assessing damage from accidents at hazardous production facilities. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200031148 (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  9. Kini R.L., Rayfa Kh. Decision-making under many criteria: preferences and substitutions. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 1981. 560 p. (In Russ.).
  10. ST TsKBA 008—2014. Pipe fittings. Calculation of reliability and safety at the design stage. Available at: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Index2/1/4293762/4293762631.htm (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  11. GOST R 12.3.047—2012. Occupational safety standards system. Fire safety of technological processes. General requirements. Methods of control. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200103505 (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  12. On the approval of the Regulations on the basic data for conducting categorization of the object of fuel and energy complex, the procedure for its implementation and the criteria for categorization (with amendments and additions): Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 5, 2012 № 459. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/70173868/ (accessed: September 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-3-15-20
Year: 2021
Issue num: March
Keywords : fuel and energy complex process safety priority scenario hierarchy analysis method displaced ideal method object categorization
Authors:
  • Kovalskiy F.S.
    Kovalskiy F.S.
    Graduate Student, kovalmails@gmail.com D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Moscow, Russia
  • Mosolov A.S.
    Mosolov A.S.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assoc. Prof. D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Moscow, Russia
  • Akinin N.I.
    Akinin N.I.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Head of the Department Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Moscow, Russia