References:
1. Barvinok V.A., Naumov L.A., Dolgikh A.V. Increase of the role of conformity assessment at the facilities controlled by the federal service on ecological, technological and nuclear supervision. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta im. akademika S.P. Koroleva = Bulletin of the Samara State Aerospace University named after Academician S.P. Korolev. 2012. Vol. 11. № 1 (32). pp. 226–232. (In Russ.).
2. Travadel S., Guarnieri F., Portelli A. Industrial Safety and Utopia: Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Risk Analysis. 2018. Vol. 38. Iss. 1. pp. 56–70. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12821
3. Mendeloff J., Gray W.B., Armour P., Neuhauser F. The re-occurrence of violations in occupational safety and health administration inspections. Regulation & Governance. 2020. 15 (4). DOI: 10.1111/rego.12315
4. Hingorani R., Tanner P. Risk-Informed Requirements for Design and Assessment of Structures Under Temporary Use. Risk Analysis. 2020. 40 (1). pp. 68–82. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13322
5. Zhang T., Liu Z., Zheng S., Qu X., Tao D. Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. 17 (15). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155613
6. Nyberg E.P., Nicholson A.E., Korb K.B., Wybrow M., Zukerman I., Mascaro S., Thakur S., Oshni Alvandi A., Riley J., Pearson R., Morris S., Herrmann M., Azad A.K.M., Bolger F., Hahn U., Lagnado D. BARD: A Structured Technique for Group Elicitation of Bayesian Networks to Support Analytic Reasoning. Risk Analysis. 2022. 42 (6). pp. 1155–1178. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13759
7. Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T. Water use and ecosystem services: a case of Russia. Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change. 2022. Vol. 13. № 2. pp. 60–69. DOI 10.18822/edgcc105930
8. Wu D., Lambert J.H. Engineering Systems and Risk Analytics. Risk Analysis. 2020. Vol. 40. № 1. pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13433
9. Large Industrial Accidents: Hazards, Threats, Challenges. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2010. № 6. pp. 48–49. (In Russ.).
10. Broughton E. The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environmental Health. 2005. № 4. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-6
11. Malyshev A. Main activities of the Federal environmental, industrial and nuclear supervision service on radiation and ecological safety assurance. Radiation and Environmental Safety in North-West Russia. 2006. pp. 5–7. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4649-9_2
12. Shiroyama H. Nuclear Safety Regulation in Japan and Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-12090-4_14.pdf?pdf=inline%20link (accessed: May 17, 2023).
13. Wheatley S., Sovacool B., Sornette D. Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents. Risk Analysis. 2016. 37 (1). pp. 99–115. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12587
14. Robert G. Batson. The Role of Maintenance in Reducing the Risk of Technological Disasters. Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology. 2021. Vol. 3 (2). DOI: 10.47363/JCERT/2021(3)118
15. Barbin N.M., Titov S.A., Kobelev A.M. Analysis of Accidents and Incidents What Happened at Nuclear Power Plants in Russia from 1992 to 2019. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/988/2/022026
16. Strygina M.A., Gritsuk I.I Hydrological safety and risk assessment of hydraulic structures. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Inzhenernye issledovaniya = RUDN Journal of Engineering Researches. 2018. Vol. 19. № 3. pp. 317–324. (In Russ.). DOI 10.22363/2312-8143-2018-19-3-317-324
17. Feinstein J.S. The Safety Regulation of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Violations, Inspections, and Abnormal Occurrences. Journal of Political Economy. 1989. Vol. 97. pp. 115–154.
18. Temasova G.N., Vergazova Yu.G., Leonov D.O Using the Pareto Diagram to Estimate Internal Losses During Engine Repairs. Agroinzheneriya = Agroengineering. 2020. № 6 (100). pp. 44–49. (In Russ.). DOI 10.26897/2687-1149-2020-6-44-49
2. Travadel S., Guarnieri F., Portelli A. Industrial Safety and Utopia: Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Risk Analysis. 2018. Vol. 38. Iss. 1. pp. 56–70. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12821
3. Mendeloff J., Gray W.B., Armour P., Neuhauser F. The re-occurrence of violations in occupational safety and health administration inspections. Regulation & Governance. 2020. 15 (4). DOI: 10.1111/rego.12315
4. Hingorani R., Tanner P. Risk-Informed Requirements for Design and Assessment of Structures Under Temporary Use. Risk Analysis. 2020. 40 (1). pp. 68–82. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13322
5. Zhang T., Liu Z., Zheng S., Qu X., Tao D. Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. 17 (15). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155613
6. Nyberg E.P., Nicholson A.E., Korb K.B., Wybrow M., Zukerman I., Mascaro S., Thakur S., Oshni Alvandi A., Riley J., Pearson R., Morris S., Herrmann M., Azad A.K.M., Bolger F., Hahn U., Lagnado D. BARD: A Structured Technique for Group Elicitation of Bayesian Networks to Support Analytic Reasoning. Risk Analysis. 2022. 42 (6). pp. 1155–1178. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13759
7. Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T. Water use and ecosystem services: a case of Russia. Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change. 2022. Vol. 13. № 2. pp. 60–69. DOI 10.18822/edgcc105930
8. Wu D., Lambert J.H. Engineering Systems and Risk Analytics. Risk Analysis. 2020. Vol. 40. № 1. pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13433
9. Large Industrial Accidents: Hazards, Threats, Challenges. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2010. № 6. pp. 48–49. (In Russ.).
10. Broughton E. The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environmental Health. 2005. № 4. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-6
11. Malyshev A. Main activities of the Federal environmental, industrial and nuclear supervision service on radiation and ecological safety assurance. Radiation and Environmental Safety in North-West Russia. 2006. pp. 5–7. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4649-9_2
12. Shiroyama H. Nuclear Safety Regulation in Japan and Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-12090-4_14.pdf?pdf=inline%20link (accessed: May 17, 2023).
13. Wheatley S., Sovacool B., Sornette D. Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents. Risk Analysis. 2016. 37 (1). pp. 99–115. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12587
14. Robert G. Batson. The Role of Maintenance in Reducing the Risk of Technological Disasters. Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology. 2021. Vol. 3 (2). DOI: 10.47363/JCERT/2021(3)118
15. Barbin N.M., Titov S.A., Kobelev A.M. Analysis of Accidents and Incidents What Happened at Nuclear Power Plants in Russia from 1992 to 2019. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/988/2/022026
16. Strygina M.A., Gritsuk I.I Hydrological safety and risk assessment of hydraulic structures. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Inzhenernye issledovaniya = RUDN Journal of Engineering Researches. 2018. Vol. 19. № 3. pp. 317–324. (In Russ.). DOI 10.22363/2312-8143-2018-19-3-317-324
17. Feinstein J.S. The Safety Regulation of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Violations, Inspections, and Abnormal Occurrences. Journal of Political Economy. 1989. Vol. 97. pp. 115–154.
18. Temasova G.N., Vergazova Yu.G., Leonov D.O Using the Pareto Diagram to Estimate Internal Losses During Engine Repairs. Agroinzheneriya = Agroengineering. 2020. № 6 (100). pp. 44–49. (In Russ.). DOI 10.26897/2687-1149-2020-6-44-49