On Some Differences in the Methodological Approaches when Modeling the Parameters of Pressure Waves from Combustion and Detonation of Fuel-Air Mixtures Clouds



The main regularities of the formation of shock air waves and air compression waves during combustion or detonation of fuel-air clouds are briefly considered in the article. Specific features are discussed related to the mathematical model of fuel-air mixture explosion, which is used in the Methodology for determining the calculated values of fire risk at the production facilities. The considered Methodology uses the same mathematical model as the corresponding Safety Guide on the assessment of the emergency explosion consequences approved by Rostechnadzor with some differences that are discussed in the article.

The approach of the Methodology is based on the consideration of one-dimensional pressure waves that are formed in the atmosphere during detonation or turbulent combustion of spherical uniformly mixed clouds. For such processes the approximate dependences of pressure on the distance are built. The validity, accuracy, as well as the field of application of such dependencies are considered in the work. 

The conclusion is made  about sufficient accuracy of the used dependencies and their good compliance to the current analogues and experiments, the provisions establishing the field of application of the  extrapolation formulas for deflagration combustion   are missing in the Methodology text. Due to this reason when calculating the  situations are possible that at the same distance from the place of explosion of the clouds of fuel-air mixtures the pressure on the front of the detonation wave is significantly less (up to 7 times) than  at the front of the deflagration waves. For deflagration combustion rates considered in the Methodology (up to 500 m/ s), this result is incorrect.

The reasons for this discrepancy are shown in the article.

In Russia the Methodology is approved as the only document on which basis the fire risk indices are calculated, which in turn are one of the main criteria for making managerial decisions in the design and construction of industrial and social objects. It is shown that considered in the article specific features of the numerical explosion models of fuel - air mixtures cloud lead not always to the justified increase of the conservatism of the obtained results. It is noted that the indicated conservatism can be deleted by introducing appropriate limitations on the field of application of the corresponding approximations.

  1. Gelfand B.E., Silnikov M.V. Barothermic effect of the explosion. Saint-Petersburg: Asterion, 2006. 657 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Gelfand B.E., Silnikov M.V. Gas explosions. Saint-Petersburg: Asterion, 2007. 238 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Shchelkin K.I. The effect of pipe roughness on the occurrence and propagation of detonation in gases. Zhurnal eksperimentalnoy i teoreticheskoy fiziki = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1940. Vol. 10. pp. 823–832. (In Russ.).
  4. Bartlme F. Gas dynamics of combustion. Moscow: Energoizdat, 1981. 280 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Adushkin V.V., Gostintsev Yu.A., Fortov V.E. Energy characteristics of the explosion and the parameters of the shock waves in the air during detonation of hydrogen-containing clouds in the free atmosphere (preprint). Chernogolovka, 1995. 85 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Gostintsev Yu.A., Gubin S.A., Shargatov V.A. Numerical modeling of processes during burning of open volumes of the mixed gas mixtures (preprint). Chernogolovka, 1986. 33 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Methodology for determining the calculated values of fire risk at production facilities. Deklarirovanie pozharnoy bezopasnosti i otsenka pozharnogo riska: sb. V 4 ch. Ch. 4. Normativnye pravovye dokumenty po otsenke pozharnogo riska, metodiki i primery (Declaration of fire safety and fire risk assessment: Digest in 4 parts. Part 4. Regulatory legal documents for fire risk assessment, methods and examples). Ser. 19. Iss. 2. Moscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2019. 192 p. (In Russ.).
  8. RD 03-409—01. Methodology for assessing the consequences of emergency explosions of fuel-air mixtures (with amendments and additions). Metodiki otsenki posledstviy avariy na opasnykh proizvodstvennykh obektakh: sb. dok. (Methods for assessing the consequences of accidents at hazardous production facilities: book of reports). Ser. 27. Iss. 2. Moscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2015. 210 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Methodology for assessing the consequences of emergency explosions of fuel-air mixtures: Safety Guide. Ser. 27. Iss. 15. Moscow: ZAO NTTs PB, 2019. 44 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Fire risk assessment guide for industrial enterprises. Available at: http://www.complexdoc.ru/ntdpdf/541573/rukovodstvo_po_otsenke_pozharnogo_riska_dlya_promyshlennykh_predpriyatii.pdf (accessed: January 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  11. GOST R 12.3.047—2012. Occupational safety standards system. Fire safety of technological processes. General requirements. Methods of control. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200103505 (accessed: January 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
  12. Van Den Bosch C.J.H., Weterings R.A.P. Methods for Calculation of physical effects — due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases) — «Yellow Book». Available at: http://content.publicatiereeksgevaarlijkestoffen.nl/documents/PGS2/PGS2-1997-v0.1-physical-effects.pdf (accessed: January 10, 2020).
  13. Tang M.J., Baker Q.A. A new set of blast curves from vapor cloud explosion. Process Safety Progress. 1999. Vol. 18. № 3. pp. 235–240.
  14. Beyker U., Koks P., Uestayn P., Kulesh Dzh., Strekhlou R. Explosive phenomena. Assessment and consequences. In 2 books. Book 1. Moscow: Mir, 1986. 319 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Melani L., Sochet I., Rocourt X., Jallais S. Review of Methods for Estimating the Overpressure and Impulse Resulting from a Hydrogen Explosion in a Confined-Obstructed Volume. Available at: http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2009/images/stories/papers/254.pdf (accessed: January 10, 2020).
  16. RB G-05-039—96. Guidance on hazard analysis of emergency explosions and determination of the parameters of their mechanical action. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200061429 (accessed: January 10, 2020). (In Russ.). 
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-5-36-42
Year: 2020
Issue num: May
Keywords : fire risk methodology detonation fuel-air mixture accident risk cloud explosion deflagration
  • Agapov A.A.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Director of the Computational Analysis Center, inform@safety.ru STC «Industrial Safety» CJSC, Moscow, Russia
  • Safonov V.S.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Chief Research Associate Gazprom VNIIGAZ, Moscow, Russia
  • Sumskoy S.I.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assoc. Prof. NRNU MEPhI, Moscow, Russia
  • Shvyryaev A.A.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Lead Researcher Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia