References:
1. On the approval of the Concept of demographic policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 9, 2007 № 1351. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/26299 (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
2. On the approval of the Federal plan for statistical work (as amended on August 12, 2020): order of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 6, 2008 № 671-р. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902101255 (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
3. Rokkel E.P. Draft of the standard classification of technical and organizational causes of injury rate in machine-building industry. Leningrad, 1955. 21 p. (In Russ.).
4. Results of monitoring of occupational safety conditions in the Russian Federation in 2018. Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://eisot.rosmintrud.ru/attachments/article/47/2018.pdf (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
5. Sviridova T.V., Bobrova O.B. Analysis of Methods Estimate of Industrial Injuries and Professional Risk. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus = XXI Century: Resumes of the Past and Challenges of the Present plus. 2018. Vol. 7. № 4 (44). pp. 250–255. (In Russ.).
6. Lukyanchikova T.L., Yamshchikova T.N., Kletsova N.V. Komparativistic Analysis of Production Traumatism: Russia and the World. Ekonomika truda = Russian Journal of Labour Economics. 2018. Vol. 5. № 3. pp. 647–662. (In Russ.).
7. Zhao D. Exploring Construction Safety and Control Measures through Electrical Fatalities: Abstract of Philosophy Degree’s Dissertation. Blacksburg, 2014. 233 p.
8. Narine G. Causes and Prevention of Electric Power Industry Accidents: A Delphi Study: Abstract of Philosophy Degree’s Dissertation. Minneapolis: Walden University, 2019. 373 p.
9. GOST R 12.0.010—2009. Occupational safety standards system. Occupational safety and health management systems. Hazard and risks identification and estimation of risks. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200080860 (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
10. Kondrateva O.E., Kravchenko M.V., Loktionov O.A. Development of the Methods for Assessing the Risk of Damage to Health of the Employees of the Electric Power Industry. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 4. pp. 63–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-4-63-68
11. Lingard H., Hallowell M.R., Salas R., Pirzadeh P. Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project. Safety Science. 2017. Vol. 91. pp. 206–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.020
12. Versteeg K., Bigelow P., Dale A.M., Chaurasia A. Utilizing construction safety leading and lagging indicators to measure project safety performance: a case study. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 120. pp. 411–421.
2. On the approval of the Federal plan for statistical work (as amended on August 12, 2020): order of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 6, 2008 № 671-р. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902101255 (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
3. Rokkel E.P. Draft of the standard classification of technical and organizational causes of injury rate in machine-building industry. Leningrad, 1955. 21 p. (In Russ.).
4. Results of monitoring of occupational safety conditions in the Russian Federation in 2018. Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://eisot.rosmintrud.ru/attachments/article/47/2018.pdf (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
5. Sviridova T.V., Bobrova O.B. Analysis of Methods Estimate of Industrial Injuries and Professional Risk. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus = XXI Century: Resumes of the Past and Challenges of the Present plus. 2018. Vol. 7. № 4 (44). pp. 250–255. (In Russ.).
6. Lukyanchikova T.L., Yamshchikova T.N., Kletsova N.V. Komparativistic Analysis of Production Traumatism: Russia and the World. Ekonomika truda = Russian Journal of Labour Economics. 2018. Vol. 5. № 3. pp. 647–662. (In Russ.).
7. Zhao D. Exploring Construction Safety and Control Measures through Electrical Fatalities: Abstract of Philosophy Degree’s Dissertation. Blacksburg, 2014. 233 p.
8. Narine G. Causes and Prevention of Electric Power Industry Accidents: A Delphi Study: Abstract of Philosophy Degree’s Dissertation. Minneapolis: Walden University, 2019. 373 p.
9. GOST R 12.0.010—2009. Occupational safety standards system. Occupational safety and health management systems. Hazard and risks identification and estimation of risks. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200080860 (accessed: May 5, 2020). (In Russ.).
10. Kondrateva O.E., Kravchenko M.V., Loktionov O.A. Development of the Methods for Assessing the Risk of Damage to Health of the Employees of the Electric Power Industry. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 4. pp. 63–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-4-63-68
11. Lingard H., Hallowell M.R., Salas R., Pirzadeh P. Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project. Safety Science. 2017. Vol. 91. pp. 206–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.020
12. Versteeg K., Bigelow P., Dale A.M., Chaurasia A. Utilizing construction safety leading and lagging indicators to measure project safety performance: a case study. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 120. pp. 411–421.