References:
1. Lukyanchikov M.I., Lesnykh V.V., Nemchin Yu.V., Bochkov A.V. On Specificities of Risk-Oriented Approach in Organizing Particular Types of Inspection and Control Activities in PJSC Gazprom. Gazovaya promyshlennost = Gas Industry. 2020. № 1 (795). pp. 106–115. (In Russ.).
2. Heinrich H.W. Industrial accident prevention: A Scientific Approach. 4th ed.: N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1959.
3. The Heinrich/Bird safety pyramid — Pioneering research has become a safety myth. Available at: https://risk-engineering.org/concept/Heinrich-Bird-accident-pyramid (accessed: April 27, 2020).
4. Hale A. Conditions of occurrence of major and minor accidents: Urban myths, deviations and accident scenario's. Tijdschrift voor toegepaste Arbowetenschap. 2002. 15 (3). pp. 34–41.
5. Bellamy L.J., Ale B.J.M., Whiston J.Y., Mud M.L., Baksteen H., Hale A.R., Papazoglou I.A., Bloemhoff A., Damen M., Oh. J.I.H. The Software Tool Storybuilder and the Analysis of the Horrible Stories of Occupational Accidents. Safety Science. 2008. 46 (2). pp. 186–197.
6. Gilbert C., Journé B., Laroche H., Bieder C. Safety Cultures, Safety Models. Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Cham: Springer Open, 2018. 166 p.
7. Tishanin A.G., Lapidus V.A., Kopysov O.A., Usoltsev A.N. Safety management methodology based on the Heinrich pyramid. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva = Methods of Quality Management. 2011. № 11. pp. 4–9. (In Russ.).
8. Lakin I.K., Abolmasov A.A., Melnikov V.A. Risk Management Model to Prevent Locomotive Malfunction. Mir transporta = World of Transport and Transportation Journal. 2013. Vol. 11. № 4 (48). pp. 130–136. (In Russ.).
9. Siva Prasad Penkey, Nihal Anwar Siddiqui. A Review on Accident Pyramid and its Empirical Interpretation in Oil&Gas Industry (Upstream). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015. Vol. 5. Iss. 1. pp. 1–3.
10. Johansen I.L., Askeland T., Dorum C. Use of «Heinrich» factor in risk assessments of ship allision in bridge design. Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore, 2019. pp. 115–122. DOI:10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3 0857-cd
11. The unified interagency methodology of assessment of damages from emergency situations of technogenic, natural and terrorist nature, as well as the classification and recording of emergencies. Moscow: FGU VNII GOChS (FTs), 2004. (In Russ.).
12. Arkhipets N.N. Economic theory: educational and methodological complex in 2 parts. Part 2 Economics of protection against emergency situations. Minsk: KII, 2005. 134 p.
2. Heinrich H.W. Industrial accident prevention: A Scientific Approach. 4th ed.: N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1959.
3. The Heinrich/Bird safety pyramid — Pioneering research has become a safety myth. Available at: https://risk-engineering.org/concept/Heinrich-Bird-accident-pyramid (accessed: April 27, 2020).
4. Hale A. Conditions of occurrence of major and minor accidents: Urban myths, deviations and accident scenario's. Tijdschrift voor toegepaste Arbowetenschap. 2002. 15 (3). pp. 34–41.
5. Bellamy L.J., Ale B.J.M., Whiston J.Y., Mud M.L., Baksteen H., Hale A.R., Papazoglou I.A., Bloemhoff A., Damen M., Oh. J.I.H. The Software Tool Storybuilder and the Analysis of the Horrible Stories of Occupational Accidents. Safety Science. 2008. 46 (2). pp. 186–197.
6. Gilbert C., Journé B., Laroche H., Bieder C. Safety Cultures, Safety Models. Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Cham: Springer Open, 2018. 166 p.
7. Tishanin A.G., Lapidus V.A., Kopysov O.A., Usoltsev A.N. Safety management methodology based on the Heinrich pyramid. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva = Methods of Quality Management. 2011. № 11. pp. 4–9. (In Russ.).
8. Lakin I.K., Abolmasov A.A., Melnikov V.A. Risk Management Model to Prevent Locomotive Malfunction. Mir transporta = World of Transport and Transportation Journal. 2013. Vol. 11. № 4 (48). pp. 130–136. (In Russ.).
9. Siva Prasad Penkey, Nihal Anwar Siddiqui. A Review on Accident Pyramid and its Empirical Interpretation in Oil&Gas Industry (Upstream). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015. Vol. 5. Iss. 1. pp. 1–3.
10. Johansen I.L., Askeland T., Dorum C. Use of «Heinrich» factor in risk assessments of ship allision in bridge design. Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore, 2019. pp. 115–122. DOI:10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3 0857-cd
11. The unified interagency methodology of assessment of damages from emergency situations of technogenic, natural and terrorist nature, as well as the classification and recording of emergencies. Moscow: FGU VNII GOChS (FTs), 2004. (In Russ.).
12. Arkhipets N.N. Economic theory: educational and methodological complex in 2 parts. Part 2 Economics of protection against emergency situations. Minsk: KII, 2005. 134 p.