Probabilistic Estimation of Industrial Safety with Incomplete Statistic Data


The article describes the approach to industrial safety (reliability) assessing with limited statistical information by quantity and quality at the same time. The quantitative data incompleteness is modeled by the distribution functions based on Chebyshev’s inequality which can be used only if the estimates of mathematical expectation and standard deviation are known. Qualitative incompleteness of statistical data is modeled by belief and plausibility functions based on the evidence theory. Qualitative incompleteness of statistical data refers to the representation of individual values of a random variable in the form of intervals. The proposed approach allows obtaining a safety (reliability) assessment based on available information without assumptions and hypotheses about the distribution functions of random variables and the estimation of the individual parameters of distribution functions. Verification of the proposed approach is demonstrated by the numerical example where the initial data is obtained by pseudo-random numbers simulation (Monte Carlo simulation). The results of the numerical example show that the reliability interval obtained by proposed approach for limited statistical data covers the theoretical reliability value for full statistical data. Extended belief and plausibility functions based on the robust Dirichlet model help to obtain a more cautious estimate by introducing a data «uncertainty» factor. The proposed approach to reliability analysis can be used to assess the safety of any industrial facilities and processes by reducing a limit state mathematical model the classical form X ≤ Y.

  1. The technical regulation on safety of buildings and facilities: Federal Law of December 30, 2009 № 384-FZ. Available at: (accessed: March 25, 2020). (In Russ).
  2. GOST 27.002—2015. Dependability in technics. Terms and definitions. Available at: (accessed: March 25, 2020). (In Russ.).
  3. Petrova I.M., Filimonov M.A., Lagutkin M.G. Assessment of the Probability of Mechanical Systems Failure Based on the Modeling of Their Technical Condition. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020. № 2. pp. 12–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-2-12-17
  4. Mahutov N.A., Ivanov V.I., Musatov V.V. Application of Technical Diagnostics for Calculation of Failure Probability of Technical Devices and Accident Risk Assessment. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 9. pp. 53–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-9-53-64
  5. Chen Y. Reliability analysis of a fire alarm system. Procedia Engineering. 2011. Vol. 24. pp. 731–736.
  6. Chen D., Yao C., Feng Z. Reliability prediction method of hydraulic system by fuzzy theory. 6-th IFAC Symposium on Mechatronic Systems Proceedings. 2013. Vol. 46. Iss. 5. pp. 457–462.
  7. Abdelkrim С., Meridjet M.S., Boutasseta N., Boulanouar L. Detection and classification of bearing faults in industrial geared motors using temporal features and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Heliyon. 2019. № 5 (8). pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02046
  8. Xu X., Li S., Song X., Wen C., Xu D. The optimal design of industrial alarm systems based on evidence theory. Control Engineering Practice. 2016. № 46. pp. 142–156.
  9. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistic. 1967. Vol. 38. № 2. pp. 325–329.
  10. Utkin L.V., Utkin V.S., Redkin A.N. Calculation of reliability of steel frames by the stability criterion for multiparametric loading with application of Chebyshev’s inequality. Nadezhnost = Reliability. 2011. № 3 (38). pp. 42–52. (In Russ.).
  11. Utkin L.V. Risk analysis and decision making in conditions of incomplete information. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. 404 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Utkin V.S., Solovyev S.A. Calculation of structural elements reliability by the bearing capacity criterion with application of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Stroitelnaya mekhanika i raschet sooruzheniy = Structural mechanics and calculation of facilities. 2015. № 5 (262). pp. 38–44. (In Russ.).
  13. Bernard J.-M. Analysis of Local or Asymmetric Dependencies in Contingency Tables using the Imprecise Dirichlet Model. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications. 2003. № 18. pp. 46–61.
  14. Rashid M.A., Mansur M.A. Reinforced high-strength concrete beams in flexure. ACI Structural Journal. 2005. Vol. 102. Iss. 3. pp. 462–471.
  15. SP 28.13330.2017. Protection against corrosion of construction. Updated edition of the Sanitary Norms and Rules (SNiP) 2.03.11—85. Available at: (accessed: March 25, 2020). (In Russ.).
  16. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions. SNiP 52-01—2003. Available at: (accessed: March 25, 2020). (In Russ.).
  17. Zhu B., Frangopol D.M. Reliability, redundancy and risk as performance indicators of structural systems during their life-cycle. Engineering Structures. 2012. № 41. pp. 34–49.
  18. Crespo L.G., Kenny S.P., Giesy D.P. Staircase predictor models for reliability and risk analysis. Structural Safety. 2018. № 75. pp. 35–44.
  19. Khoroshun E.G., Samchuk-Khabarova N.Ya., Esipov Yu.V. Development of the Methodology for the Limits of Acceptable Occupational Risk. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 6. pp. 86–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-6-86-89
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-9-88-93
Year: 2020
Issue num: September
Keywords : safety reliability uncertainty failure probability Chebyshev’s inequality evidence theory
  • Solovyev S.A.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assoc. Prof., Vologda State University, Vologda, Russia