Unauthorized Activation of Shock-wave Tubes of Non-electrical Initiation Systems



Annotation:

The article presents the results of experimental studies of non-electric initiation systems «Iskra», «Korshun-M», Exel and Rionel. The studies were aimed at determining the percentage of components of the reaction mixture of shock-wave tubes of various manufacturers, the sensitivity of these tubes to electrostatic discharge in the pilot breakdown plant, and the electrical potential that occurs during dynamic stretching of the shock-wave tubes. It is shown that unauthorized activation of the shock-wave tubes of non-electric initiation systems is possible with a simultaneous combination of mechanical (stretching with breakage of the shock-wave tubes), and the effects of electrical (static electricity discharge). In this case the shock-wave tubes of non-electric initiation system Exel contain considerably more aluminum than the shock-wave tubes of non-electrical initiating system devices «spark», Rionel and «Hawk-M». The resistance of shock-wave tubes from various manufacturers to electrostatic discharge depends on at least two parameters: the content of aluminum in the reaction mixture and the mechanical impact on them. The shock-wave tubes of non — electric initiation system Exel have the highest sensitivity to electrostatic discharge, and the shock-wave tubes «Korshun-M» have the lowest sensitivity. The minimum energy required for actuating the shock-wave tubes of the non-electric initiation system Exel on the experimental breakdown of the unit was 64 mJ, for the actuation of «Korshun-M» shock-wave tube 160 mJ is required. Dynamic stretching of shock-wave tubes (with or without rupture) leads to the formation of an electric pulse, while the forced electrification of the shock-wave tube surface reduces both the amplitude and the duration of the pulse. An exception is the shock-wave tubes of «Korshun-M» non-electric initiation system, in which the opposite picture is observed. It is proposed to prevent entanglement, pulling and rupture of the shock-wave tubes when handling non-electric initiation system.

References:
  1. Sysoev A.A. Technological properties of unelectric systems initiations downhole charges on quarry. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University. 2016. № 1. pp. 34–39. (In Russ.).
  2. Andreev V.V., Guskov A.V., Milevskiy K.E., Slesareva E.Yu. The theory of combustion and explosion: high-energy materials: textbook. textbook for higher educational institutions. Moscow: Yurayt, 2019. 325 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Holmberg R., Salomonsson D. Snap, Slap & Shoot — A possible cause for premature ignition of shock tube. SAFEX Newsletter. 2011. № 38. pp. 4–9.
  4. Significant Incident Report № 209. Available at: http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/Documents/Safety/MSH_SIR_209.pdf (accessed: January 1, 2020).
  5. GOST 31610.32-1-2015/IEC/TS 60079-32-1:2013. Explosive atmospheres. Part 32-1. Electrostatics. Hazards. Guidance. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200135553 (accessed: January 30, 2020). (In Russ.).
  6. GOST 12.1.018—93. Occupational safety standards system. Fire and explosion safety of static electricity. General requirements. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/5200318 (accessed: January 30, 2020). (In Russ.).
  7. Verbanova A.O., Generalov M.B., Klevleev V.M., Kuznetsova I.A., Chevikov S.A. Issues of the electrostatical security assurance of disperse flammable and explosive materials. Vestnik tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Technological University Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 21. № 9. pp. 38–42. (In Russ.).
  8. Verbanova A.O., Chevikov S.A., Kuznetsova I.A., Klevleev V.M. On Ensuring Electrostatic Intrinsic Safety of High-Energy Loose Materials Production. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 4. pp. 52–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-4-52-57
  9. GOST 12.1.044—89. Оccupational safety standards system (OSSS). Fire and explosion hazard of substances and materials. Nomenclature of indices and methods of their determination (with Amendment № 1). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200004802 (accessed: January 30, 2020). (In Russ.).
  10. GOST 31610.32-2—2016. Explosive atmospheres. Part 32-2. Electrostatics hazards. Tests. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200146766 (accessed: January 30, 2020). (In Russ.).
  11. Lowke J.J. Theory of electrical breakdown in air. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2012. Vol. 25. № 2. pp. 202–210.
  12. Klevleev V.M., Minaev D.S., Aliferenkova M.A. Fire and explosion hazard of suspended ultrafine dust. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2009. Vol. 45. Iss. 11. pp. 749–753.
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-8-79-85
Year: 2020
Issue num: August
Keywords : electrostatic discharge spark discharge non-electric initiation system shock-wave tube Snap Slap & Shoot effect reaction mixture
Authors: